GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L
GBPC.L (L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and SEUC.L (SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - GBPC.L tracks the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR while SEUC.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBPC.L returned -0.17%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for SEUC.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBPC.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SEUC.L.
Performance
GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GBPC.L is traded in GBp, while SEUC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SEUC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBPC.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than SEUC.L's -0.19% return.
GBPC.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SEUC.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.85%
GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBPC.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.12% | 6.83% | 2.78% | 8.45% | -17.18% | -2.43% | -0.23% |
SEUC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | -0.19% | 8.55% | -0.52% | 2.10% | 1.44% | -6.18% | -0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBPC.L and SEUC.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBPC.L
SEUC.L
GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBPC.L | SEUC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 2.06 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 4.57 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBPC.L | SEUC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.14 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.32 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.15 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBPC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.18%, which is greater than SEUC.L's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPC.L and SEUC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBPC.L | SEUC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.18% | -17.58% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.14% | -2.25% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.14% | -2.84% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.49% | -5.79% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -12.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -1.25% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -6.39% | -5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 1.02% | +0.23% |
Volatility
GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) at 1.16%. This indicates that GBPC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEUC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBPC.L | SEUC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 1.16% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.09% | 2.78% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 4.09% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.19% | 5.40% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.15% | 7.10% | +1.05% |
GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBPC.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SEUC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GBPC.L vs. SEUC.L - Dividend Comparison
GBPC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than SEUC.L's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBPC.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 5.14% | 5.00% | 4.86% | 3.58% | 2.16% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEUC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 2.96% | 3.05% | 2.59% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.30% | 0.23% | 0.17% | 0.11% | 0.28% | 0.50% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBPC.L and SEUC.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBPC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBPC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SEUC.L.
GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while SEUC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GBPC.L and 0.20% for SEUC.L.
Find the right allocation for GBPC.L and SEUC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer