GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L
GBPC.L (L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and ROBG.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBPC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while ROBG.L is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBPC.L returned -0.17%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for ROBG.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBPC.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for ROBG.L.
Performance
GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBPC.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than ROBG.L's 28.02% return.
GBPC.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBG.L
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 28.02%
- 6M
- 25.47%
- 1Y
- 57.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBPC.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.12% | 6.83% | 2.78% | 8.45% | -17.18% | -2.43% | -0.23% |
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 28.02% | 14.68% | -0.04% | 18.36% | -25.90% | 17.05% | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBPC.L and ROBG.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.15 |
The correlation between GBPC.L and ROBG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBPC.L
ROBG.L
GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBPC.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.47 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 4.18 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 15.58 | -11.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBPC.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 2.73 | -1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.40 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.66 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBPC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.18%, smaller than the maximum ROBG.L drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPC.L and ROBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBPC.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.18% | -34.50% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.14% | -13.72% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.14% | -29.66% | +25.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.49% | -34.50% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -1.55% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -10.33% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 3.69% | -2.44% |
Volatility
GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) is 3.33%, while L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that GBPC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBPC.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 7.77% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.09% | 16.14% | -11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 20.97% | -14.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.19% | 20.44% | -12.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.15% | 20.18% | -12.03% |
GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBPC.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBG.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBPC.L vs. ROBG.L - Dividend Comparison
GBPC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, while ROBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBPC.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 5.14% | 5.00% | 4.86% | 3.58% | 2.16% | 0.87% |
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBPC.L and ROBG.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBPC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBPC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBG.L.
GBPC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while ROBG.L is Robotics. GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while ROBG.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GBPC.L and 0.80% for ROBG.L.
Find the right allocation for GBPC.L and ROBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer