PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBP=X vs. CELH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBP=X vs. CELH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in USD/GBP (GBP=X) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBP=X is traded in GBP, while CELH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CELH values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBP=X achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than CELH's -34.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GBP=X has underperformed CELH with an annualized return of -0.13%, while CELH has yielded a comparatively higher 45.06% annualized return.


GBP=X

1D
0.17%
1M
0.37%
6M
0.81%
YTD
0.88%
1Y
0.95%
3Y*
-0.67%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
-0.13%

CELH

1D
-2.21%
1M
2.60%
6M
-43.35%
YTD
-34.21%
1Y
-33.18%
3Y*
-16.95%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
45.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBP=X vs. CELH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBP=X
USD/GBP
0.88%-7.12%1.75%-5.00%11.89%0.95%-2.94%-3.80%5.93%-8.65%
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
-34.21%61.28%-50.84%49.35%56.11%49.62%911.02%33.90%-29.99%95.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GBP=X and CELH is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBP=X vs. CELH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBP=X
GBP=X Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GBP=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBP=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBP=X Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GBP=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBP=X Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CELH
CELH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CELH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CELH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CELH Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CELH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CELH Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBP=X vs. CELH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USD/GBP (GBP=X) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBP=XCELHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.93

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

-0.58

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

-0.99

+1.27

GBP=X vs. CELH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBP=X Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the CELH Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBP=X and CELH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBP=X vs. CELH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBP=X drawdown since its inception was -22.85%, smaller than the maximum CELH drawdown of -77.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBP=X and CELH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBP=XCELHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.85%

-77.39%

+54.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-57.36%

+51.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.79%

-77.39%

+64.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.85%

-77.39%

+54.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.85%

-77.39%

+54.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.01%

-70.47%

+50.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.30%

-28.03%

+16.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

33.46%

-30.62%

Volatility

GBP=X vs. CELH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USD/GBP (GBP=X) is 1.13%, while Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a volatility of 15.74%. This indicates that GBP=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CELH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBP=XCELHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

15.74%

-14.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

38.31%

-33.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14%

57.82%

-51.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

64.76%

-56.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

68.75%

-60.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBP=X and CELH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CELH has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to GBP=X (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBP=X dropped -22.85% vs CELH's -77.39%.

GBP=X currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBP=X and CELH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer