GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L
GBP5.L (L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF) and RTWP.L (L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBP5.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while RTWP.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBP5.L returned 2.30%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for RTWP.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBP5.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RTWP.L.
Performance
GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBP5.L achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than RTWP.L's 16.93% return.
GBP5.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
RTWP.L
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 36.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.05%
GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBP5.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF | 0.88% | 6.37% | 4.55% | 6.90% | -6.01% | -0.54% |
RTWP.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 16.93% | 3.61% | 11.18% | 13.44% | -8.94% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBP5.L and RTWP.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBP5.L
RTWP.L
GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (RTWP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBP5.L | RTWP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 4.93 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 14.84 | -5.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBP5.L | RTWP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.34 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.44 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.70 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBP5.L drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, smaller than the maximum RTWP.L drawdown of -35.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBP5.L and RTWP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBP5.L | RTWP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -35.32% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -7.40% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.82% | -28.77% | +26.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.97% | -28.77% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -7.05% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 2.46% | -1.94% |
Volatility
GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L) is 1.86%, while L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (RTWP.L) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that GBP5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTWP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBP5.L | RTWP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.86% | 4.55% | -2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 10.96% | -7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 15.61% | -12.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 19.25% | -15.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 20.40% | -16.92% |
GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBP5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RTWP.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBP5.L vs. RTWP.L - Dividend Comparison
GBP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while RTWP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBP5.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF | 4.58% | 4.40% | 3.78% | 2.56% | 1.05% | 0.32% |
RTWP.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBP5.L and RTWP.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBP5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBP5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RTWP.L.
GBP5.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while RTWP.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. GBP5.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while RTWP.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GBP5.L and 0.30% for RTWP.L.
Find the right allocation for GBP5.L and RTWP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer