PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBND vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBND vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBND achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 10.87% return.


GBND

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.41%
6M
-0.10%
YTD
0.13%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.61%
6M
9.21%
YTD
10.87%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBND vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GBND and GPIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBND vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBND
GBND Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBND vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBNDGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.78

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

13.30

-9.21

GBND vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBND and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBND vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBND drawdown since its inception was -2.76%, smaller than the maximum GPIX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBND and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBNDGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-17.50%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-7.71%

+4.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

0.00%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-1.47%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.61%

-0.64%

Volatility

GBND vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) is 1.13%, while Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that GBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBNDGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

3.91%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

8.82%

-5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

10.86%

-7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

13.81%

-10.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.64%

13.81%

-10.17%

GBND vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBND vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

GBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than GPIX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GBND
Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
3.84%2.20%0.00%0.00%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.06%8.01%7.45%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBND and GPIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPIX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to GBND (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBND dropped -2.76% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 21.63% vs 4.33% for GBND. On fees, GBND is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 21.63% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GBND is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.06%, compared with 3.84% for GBND.

GBND is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while GPIX is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBND and 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBND and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer