PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBMFX vs. TTMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBMFX vs. TTMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) and T. Rowe Price Total Return Fund Class I (TTMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBMFX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than TTMIX's -0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GBMFX has underperformed TTMIX with an annualized return of 6.56%, while TTMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.


GBMFX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.97%
6M
8.22%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
6.56%

TTMIX

1D
-1.71%
1M
-0.73%
6M
-0.39%
YTD
-0.79%
1Y
-2.61%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBMFX vs. TTMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBMFX
GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund
10.04%22.89%4.33%13.46%-2.24%2.97%-2.50%11.62%-5.36%13.05%
TTMIX
T. Rowe Price Total Return Fund Class I
-0.79%6.97%38.33%39.41%-40.85%9.92%53.86%35.84%-1.73%33.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GBMFX and TTMIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBMFX vs. TTMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBMFX
GBMFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GBMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GBMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TTMIX
TTMIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TTMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TTMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBMFX vs. TTMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) and T. Rowe Price Total Return Fund Class I (TTMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBMFXTTMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

0.99

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

-0.11

+4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

-0.24

+14.76

GBMFX vs. TTMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBMFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the TTMIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBMFX and TTMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBMFX vs. TTMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBMFX drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum TTMIX drawdown of -47.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBMFX and TTMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBMFXTTMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-47.11%

+23.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-17.25%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.16%

-20.68%

+13.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.20%

-47.11%

+33.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.40%

-47.11%

+23.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-8.59%

+6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-10.25%

+6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

7.57%

-5.97%

Volatility

GBMFX vs. TTMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) is 2.28%, while T. Rowe Price Total Return Fund Class I (TTMIX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that GBMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBMFXTTMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

6.40%

-4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

12.83%

-6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.33%

15.64%

-8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

21.40%

-14.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

20.77%

-12.81%

GBMFX vs. TTMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBMFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than TTMIX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBMFX vs. TTMIX - Dividend Comparison

GBMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than TTMIX's 25.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBMFX
GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund
3.84%4.16%5.14%5.64%3.20%2.46%3.73%3.35%3.67%2.39%1.60%2.10%
TTMIX
T. Rowe Price Total Return Fund Class I
25.47%25.27%7.45%7.80%17.43%8.53%5.27%2.44%1.41%2.47%2.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBMFX and TTMIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTMIX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to GBMFX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBMFX dropped -23.40% vs TTMIX's -47.11%.

GBMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBMFX and TTMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer