PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBLD vs. EFFE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBLD vs. EFFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GBLD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EFFE

1D
-2.70%
1M
12.05%
YTD
25.73%
6M
24.36%
1Y
39.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBLD vs. EFFE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GBLD
Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF
4.52%17.95%1.78%
EFFE
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
25.73%22.42%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GBLD and EFFE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBLD vs. EFFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBLD

EFFE
EFFE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EFFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFFE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EFFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFFE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBLD vs. EFFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBLD vs. EFFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBLDEFFEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

Drawdowns

GBLD vs. EFFE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBLDEFFEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

Volatility

GBLD vs. EFFE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBLDEFFEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

GBLD vs. EFFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EFFE's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBLD vs. EFFE - Dividend Comparison

GBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than EFFE's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EFFE
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
3.73%4.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBLD
Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF
3.45%3.27%5.34%6.60%3.79%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBLD and EFFE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for EFFE.

EFFE has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 3.45% for GBLD.

GBLD is categorized as Sustainable, while EFFE is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GBLD and 0.69% for EFFE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBLD and EFFE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer