PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBIL vs. JUCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBIL vs. JUCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GBIL vs. JUCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
0.85%4.12%5.24%4.91%0.71%
JUCY
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF
1.94%5.50%3.89%3.27%0.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBIL achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than JUCY's 1.94% return.


GBIL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.84%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*

JUCY

1D
0.14%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.94%
6M
3.55%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GBIL vs. JUCY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBIL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JUCY's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GBIL vs. JUCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBIL
GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

JUCY
JUCY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JUCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUCY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JUCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUCY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBIL vs. JUCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBILJUCYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

16.24

1.43

+14.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

84.40

2.14

+82.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

25.69

1.27

+24.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

200.79

3.70

+197.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1,330.33

11.37

+1,318.96

GBIL vs. JUCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBIL Sharpe Ratio is 16.24, which is higher than the JUCY Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBIL and JUCY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBILJUCYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24

1.43

+14.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.79

1.35

+3.45

Correlation

The correlation between GBIL and JUCY is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GBIL vs. JUCY - Dividend Comparison

GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than JUCY's 8.54% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
3.86%4.02%4.93%4.77%1.37%0.00%0.81%2.20%1.70%0.74%0.11%
JUCY
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF
8.54%7.98%7.83%9.31%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GBIL vs. JUCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum JUCY drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIL and JUCY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GBILJUCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-1.56%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-1.47%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-0.33%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.51%

-0.51%

Volatility

GBIL vs. JUCY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) is 0.08%, while Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that GBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JUCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GBILJUCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

1.34%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

2.63%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25%

3.86%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

3.36%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.47%

3.36%

-2.89%