GBIL vs. JPST
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST).
GBIL and JPST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GBIL is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2016. JPST is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 17, 2017.
Performance
GBIL vs. JPST - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GBIL vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 0.80% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 4.91% | 1.05% | -0.08% | 0.79% | 2.31% | 1.78% | 0.52% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 0.71% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 5.13% | 1.14% | 0.11% | 2.18% | 3.34% | 2.23% | 1.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBIL achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 0.71% return.
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- —
JPST
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GBIL vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBIL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GBIL vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank
GBIL
JPST
GBIL vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBIL | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 16.02 | 7.27 | +8.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 81.72 | 13.92 | +67.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 24.01 | 3.41 | +20.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 199.80 | 14.93 | +184.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,295.81 | 94.51 | +1,201.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBIL | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02 | 7.27 | +8.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.54 | 6.16 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.79 | 3.16 | +1.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between GBIL and JPST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GBIL vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison
GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than JPST's 4.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.89% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.36% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GBIL vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum JPST drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIL and JPST.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBIL | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -3.28% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -0.30% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.76% | -0.79% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.08% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.05% | -0.05% |
Volatility
GBIL vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) is 0.08%, while JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) has a volatility of 0.22%. This indicates that GBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GBIL | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.22% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.15% | 0.35% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25% | 0.61% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 0.57% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.47% | 0.94% | -0.47% |