GBIL vs. DCMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB).
GBIL and DCMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GBIL is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2016. DCMB is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Mar 31, 2023.
Performance
GBIL vs. DCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GBIL vs. DCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 0.80% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 3.72% |
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF | 0.90% | 5.86% | 6.86% | 5.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBIL achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than DCMB's 0.90% return.
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- —
DCMB
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GBIL vs. DCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBIL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GBIL vs. DCMB — Risk / Return Rank
GBIL
DCMB
GBIL vs. DCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBIL | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 16.02 | 3.69 | +12.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 81.72 | 5.82 | +75.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 24.01 | 1.85 | +22.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 199.80 | 7.60 | +192.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,295.81 | 29.95 | +1,265.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBIL | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02 | 3.69 | +12.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.79 | 4.01 | +0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between GBIL and DCMB is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GBIL vs. DCMB - Dividend Comparison
GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than DCMB's 4.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.89% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF | 4.80% | 4.84% | 5.52% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GBIL vs. DCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum DCMB drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIL and DCMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBIL | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -0.84% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -0.68% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.43% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.10% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.17% | -0.17% |
Volatility
GBIL vs. DCMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) is 0.08%, while Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) has a volatility of 0.43%. This indicates that GBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GBIL | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.43% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.15% | 0.74% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25% | 1.39% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 1.59% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.47% | 1.59% | -1.12% |