PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBIL vs. BBRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBIL vs. BBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBIL achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than BBRE's 23.40% return.


GBIL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.70%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.30%

BBRE

1D
2.14%
1M
4.84%
6M
20.78%
YTD
23.40%
1Y
24.14%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.35M$4.29M$4.76M
$51.18M$55.98M$72.80M

GBIL vs. BBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
1.90%4.12%5.24%4.91%1.05%-0.08%0.79%2.31%1.11%
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
23.40%2.09%8.24%13.85%-24.68%42.99%-7.55%26.06%-2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GBIL and BBRE is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.02

The correlation between GBIL and BBRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBIL vs. BBRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBIL
GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BBRE
BBRE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBIL vs. BBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBILBBREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+15.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+139.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

75.95

1.29

+74.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

191.66

2.99

+188.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,147.30

9.58

+2,137.72

GBIL vs. BBRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBIL Sharpe Ratio is 17.10, which is higher than the BBRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBIL and BBRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBIL vs. BBRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum BBRE drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIL and BBRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBILBBREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-43.61%

+42.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-8.07%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-18.92%

+18.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.76%

-31.15%

+30.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-10.35%

+10.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

2.51%

-2.51%

Volatility

GBIL vs. BBRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) is 0.06%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that GBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBILBBREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

4.86%

-4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

10.88%

-10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23%

14.29%

-14.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

18.81%

-18.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.47%

22.49%

-22.02%

GBIL vs. BBRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBIL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRE's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBIL vs. BBRE - Dividend Comparison

GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than BBRE's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
2.51%3.24%3.19%3.68%2.62%1.70%3.17%2.19%1.96%0.00%0.00%
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
3.71%4.02%4.93%4.77%1.37%0.00%0.81%2.20%1.70%0.74%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBIL and BBRE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBRE has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to GBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBIL dropped -0.76% vs BBRE's -43.61%.

On 5-year performance, BBRE leads with 5.60% vs 3.42% for GBIL. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBRE has performed better with a 5.60% return vs 3.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GBIL.

GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 2.51% for BBRE.

GBIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while BBRE is REIT. GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index, while BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GBIL and 0.11% for BBRE.

GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.10 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBIL and BBRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer