PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GBHY.L having a 1.15% return and IHYA.L slightly lower at 1.10%.


GBHY.L

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.96%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
10Y*

IHYA.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.70%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GBHY.L and IHYA.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2023

0.75

The correlation between GBHY.L and IHYA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBHY.L
GBHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GBHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GBHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IHYA.L
IHYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IHYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IHYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBHY.LIHYA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.45

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

12.30

-4.71

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the IHYA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBHY.L and IHYA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBHY.LIHYA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.93

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.56

+0.75

Drawdowns

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBHY.L drawdown since its inception was -5.09%, smaller than the maximum IHYA.L drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBHY.L and IHYA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBHY.LIHYA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-22.58%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-2.82%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.17%

-4.83%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.31%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-2.23%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.56%

+0.28%

Volatility

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L) at 1.36%. This indicates that GBHY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHYA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBHY.LIHYA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.36%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.54%

2.87%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.61%

3.58%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

6.81%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.66%

7.89%

-2.23%

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBHY.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IHYA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBHY.L vs. IHYA.L - Dividend Comparison

GBHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, while IHYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GBHY.L and IHYA.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBHY.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBHY.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IHYA.L.

GBHY.L tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global High Yield Liquid Corporate Climate Transition ESG Bond Index, while IHYA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBHY.L and 0.50% for IHYA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBHY.L and IHYA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer