CIBFX vs. WARAX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX).
CIBFX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Jul 30, 1987. WARAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 29, 2012.
Performance
CIBFX vs. WARAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIBFX vs. WARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBFX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 | 0.14% | 20.29% | 10.16% | 8.90% | -7.21% | 14.95% | 3.14% | 17.16% | -7.10% | 13.88% |
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund | 14.79% | 8.07% | 5.93% | 12.53% | -2.75% | 2.25% | -3.25% | 11.65% | -5.78% | 12.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBFX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than WARAX's 14.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBFX has outperformed WARAX with an annualized return of 7.34%, while WARAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.60% annualized return.
CIBFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 14.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
WARAX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIBFX vs. WARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBFX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than WARAX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIBFX vs. WARAX — Risk / Return Rank
CIBFX
WARAX
CIBFX vs. WARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBFX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 2.45 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 3.28 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 4.34 | -2.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 10.20 | -2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBFX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.45 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.93 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBFX and WARAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CIBFX vs. WARAX - Dividend Comparison
CIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than WARAX's 1.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBFX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 | 7.70% | 7.65% | 5.69% | 3.41% | 3.37% | 3.08% | 3.34% | 4.04% | 3.72% | 4.37% | 3.46% | 3.56% |
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund | 1.74% | 2.00% | 10.90% | 2.80% | 2.34% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.38% | 2.66% | 1.77% | 0.76% | 1.35% |
Drawdowns
CIBFX vs. WARAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBFX drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than WARAX's maximum drawdown of -23.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBFX and WARAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBFX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -23.16% | -20.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -5.06% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.68% | -14.64% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.28% | -23.16% | -2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -0.24% | -6.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -3.88% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 2.15% | -0.34% |
Volatility
CIBFX vs. WARAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-1 (CIBFX) is 3.31%, while Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that CIBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIBFX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 3.66% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.95% | 7.21% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.12% | 8.83% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.93% | 7.60% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 7.91% | +2.95% |