PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBFAX vs. VIESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBFAX vs. VIESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) and Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund (VIESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBFAX achieves a 20.62% return, which is significantly higher than VIESX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GBFAX has underperformed VIESX with an annualized return of 7.31%, while VIESX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.42% annualized return.


GBFAX

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
20.62%
6M
21.61%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
7.31%

VIESX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.67%
1Y
-0.08%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBFAX vs. VIESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBFAX
VanEck Emerging Markets Fund
20.62%30.27%-0.31%10.60%-25.21%-12.13%16.43%29.53%-23.30%49.70%
VIESX
Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund
0.43%13.61%3.62%21.83%-22.92%-1.62%38.88%18.28%-5.40%31.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GBFAX and VIESX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2013

0.73

The correlation between GBFAX and VIESX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBFAX vs. VIESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBFAX
GBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VIESX
VIESX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
VIESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIESX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
VIESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIESX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBFAX vs. VIESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) and Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund (VIESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBFAXVIESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.01

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

-0.00

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

-0.01

+9.73

GBFAX vs. VIESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the VIESX Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBFAX and VIESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBFAX vs. VIESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBFAX drawdown since its inception was -75.51%, which is greater than VIESX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBFAX and VIESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBFAXVIESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.51%

-35.10%

-40.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.62%

-10.58%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

-11.97%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.80%

-35.10%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.34%

-35.10%

-15.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.14%

-8.47%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.79%

-9.72%

-10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

4.29%

-0.45%

Volatility

GBFAX vs. VIESX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund (VIESX) at 4.34%. This indicates that GBFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBFAXVIESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.58%

4.34%

+8.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.90%

9.40%

+11.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.99%

11.55%

+11.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

13.24%

+5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

13.23%

+5.46%

GBFAX vs. VIESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBFAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VIESX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBFAX vs. VIESX - Dividend Comparison

GBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than VIESX's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBFAX
VanEck Emerging Markets Fund
0.53%0.64%0.92%1.17%3.85%8.09%0.15%1.56%0.03%0.10%0.13%0.01%
VIESX
Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund
2.78%2.79%3.64%0.00%0.00%8.80%1.17%2.06%0.38%0.83%2.01%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBFAX and VIESX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBFAX has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to VIESX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBFAX dropped -75.51% vs VIESX's -35.10%.

GBFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBFAX and VIESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer