PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBFAX vs. ESCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBFAX achieves a 26.34% return, which is significantly higher than ESCIX's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GBFAX has underperformed ESCIX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while ESCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.82% annualized return.


GBFAX

1D
3.30%
1M
7.08%
YTD
26.34%
6M
28.29%
1Y
49.04%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
7.56%

ESCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.91%
6M
10.36%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBFAX
VanEck Emerging Markets Fund
26.34%30.27%-0.31%10.60%-25.21%-12.13%16.43%29.53%-23.30%49.70%
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
8.91%26.07%3.55%19.64%-24.45%11.93%43.41%15.24%-22.01%28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GBFAX and ESCIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between GBFAX and ESCIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBFAX vs. ESCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBFAX
GBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ESCIX
ESCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ESCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ESCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBFAXESCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.54

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

4.78

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

17.81

-5.05

GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the ESCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBFAX and ESCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBFAX drawdown since its inception was -75.51%, which is greater than ESCIX's maximum drawdown of -48.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBFAX and ESCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBFAXESCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.51%

-48.76%

-26.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.62%

-5.70%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

-19.97%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.80%

-36.59%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.34%

-48.76%

-1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.80%

-13.29%

-6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

1.52%

+2.29%

Volatility

GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) has a higher volatility of 11.27% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that GBFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBFAXESCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.27%

0.00%

+11.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.14%

6.72%

+13.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

11.24%

+11.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

15.63%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

17.57%

+1.08%

GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBFAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than ESCIX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Dividend Comparison

GBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than ESCIX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
0.42%0.91%0.00%0.56%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.11%1.66%1.16%0.00%
GBFAX
VanEck Emerging Markets Fund
0.51%0.64%0.92%1.17%3.85%8.09%0.15%1.56%0.03%0.10%0.13%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBFAX and ESCIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBFAX has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to ESCIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBFAX dropped -75.51% vs ESCIX's -48.76%.

ESCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBFAX and ESCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer