GBFAX vs. ESCIX
GBFAX (VanEck Emerging Markets Fund) and ESCIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, GBFAX returned 7.56%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for ESCIX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBFAX charges 1.53%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for ESCIX.
Performance
GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBFAX achieves a 26.34% return, which is significantly higher than ESCIX's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GBFAX has underperformed ESCIX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while ESCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.82% annualized return.
GBFAX
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- YTD
- 26.34%
- 6M
- 28.29%
- 1Y
- 49.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
ESCIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 26.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBFAX VanEck Emerging Markets Fund | 26.34% | 30.27% | -0.31% | 10.60% | -25.21% | -12.13% | 16.43% | 29.53% | -23.30% | 49.70% |
ESCIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund | 8.91% | 26.07% | 3.55% | 19.64% | -24.45% | 11.93% | 43.41% | 15.24% | -22.01% | 28.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBFAX and ESCIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GBFAX and ESCIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBFAX vs. ESCIX — Risk / Return Rank
GBFAX
ESCIX
GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBFAX | ESCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.54 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 4.78 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.75 | 17.81 | -5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBFAX drawdown since its inception was -75.51%, which is greater than ESCIX's maximum drawdown of -48.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBFAX and ESCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBFAX | ESCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.51% | -48.76% | -26.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.62% | -5.70% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.10% | -19.97% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.80% | -36.59% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.34% | -48.76% | -1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.74% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.80% | -13.29% | -6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 1.52% | +2.29% |
Volatility
GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) has a higher volatility of 11.27% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that GBFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBFAX | ESCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.27% | 0.00% | +11.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.14% | 6.72% | +13.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.33% | 11.24% | +11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 15.63% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 17.57% | +1.08% |
GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBFAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than ESCIX's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBFAX vs. ESCIX - Dividend Comparison
GBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than ESCIX's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESCIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund | 0.42% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.11% | 1.66% | 1.16% | 0.00% |
GBFAX VanEck Emerging Markets Fund | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 1.17% | 3.85% | 8.09% | 0.15% | 1.56% | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.13% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBFAX and ESCIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBFAX has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to ESCIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBFAX dropped -75.51% vs ESCIX's -48.76%.
ESCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBFAX and ESCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer