PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBFAX vs. LCSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBFAX vs. LCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBFAX achieves a 23.54% return, which is significantly lower than LCSMX's 63.33% return.


GBFAX

1D
-1.31%
1M
1.29%
YTD
23.54%
6M
25.39%
1Y
43.86%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
7.15%

LCSMX

1D
-2.37%
1M
8.58%
YTD
63.33%
6M
70.26%
1Y
122.05%
3Y*
30.97%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBFAX vs. LCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GBFAX
VanEck Emerging Markets Fund
23.54%30.27%-0.31%10.60%-25.21%-12.13%16.43%29.53%-25.48%
LCSMX
Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund
63.33%51.52%-13.60%16.26%-27.25%4.73%35.72%6.81%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GBFAX and LCSMX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.75

The correlation between GBFAX and LCSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBFAX vs. LCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBFAX
GBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

LCSMX
LCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBFAX vs. LCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBFAXLCSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.84

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

8.08

-5.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.29

31.36

-19.07

GBFAX vs. LCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is lower than the LCSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBFAX and LCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBFAXLCSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

4.89

-2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.60

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.65

-0.29

Drawdowns

GBFAX vs. LCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBFAX drawdown since its inception was -75.51%, which is greater than LCSMX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBFAX and LCSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBFAXLCSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.51%

-39.72%

-35.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.62%

-15.39%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

-23.31%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.80%

-39.72%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-2.77%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-13.72%

-6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

3.96%

-0.32%

Volatility

GBFAX vs. LCSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) is 8.52%, while Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) has a volatility of 13.49%. This indicates that GBFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBFAXLCSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

13.49%

-4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.60%

22.84%

-5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

25.44%

-5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

19.27%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

20.03%

-1.62%

GBFAX vs. LCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBFAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBFAX vs. LCSMX - Dividend Comparison

GBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than LCSMX's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBFAX
VanEck Emerging Markets Fund
0.52%0.64%0.92%1.17%3.85%8.09%0.15%1.56%0.03%0.10%0.13%0.01%
LCSMX
Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund
0.61%1.00%1.29%1.22%1.11%3.03%0.48%0.88%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBFAX and LCSMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCSMX has higher volatility (13.49%) compared to GBFAX (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBFAX dropped -75.51% vs LCSMX's -39.72%.

LCSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBFAX and LCSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer