PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBDV.L achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly lower than VHYL.L's 13.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GBDV.L has underperformed VHYL.L with an annualized return of 6.46%, while VHYL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.


GBDV.L

1D
0.27%
1M
3.68%
6M
8.12%
YTD
12.11%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
6.46%

VHYL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.25%
6M
9.49%
YTD
13.32%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
12.11%9.25%8.98%1.23%4.57%16.69%-12.13%15.83%-3.84%8.16%
VHYL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
13.32%18.23%11.22%5.25%5.95%19.23%-3.53%17.00%-6.59%8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GBDV.L and VHYL.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between GBDV.L and VHYL.L has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GBDV.L
VHYL.L

Financial Services

23.0%
28.2%

Utilities

16.9%
5.3%

Industrials

12.0%
12.2%

Real Estate

11.4%
0.8%

Communication Services

10.3%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
8.5%

Energy

7.8%
8.7%

Healthcare

3.8%
11.1%

Technology

2.9%
9.5%

Basic Materials

2.3%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
7.2%

Financial Services

GBDV.L
23.0%
VHYL.L
28.2%

Utilities

GBDV.L
16.9%
VHYL.L
5.3%

Industrials

GBDV.L
12.0%
VHYL.L
12.2%

Real Estate

GBDV.L
11.4%
VHYL.L
0.8%

Communication Services

GBDV.L
10.3%
VHYL.L
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

GBDV.L
8.4%
VHYL.L
8.5%

Energy

GBDV.L
7.8%
VHYL.L
8.7%

Healthcare

GBDV.L
3.8%
VHYL.L
11.1%

Technology

GBDV.L
2.9%
VHYL.L
9.5%

Basic Materials

GBDV.L
2.3%
VHYL.L
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GBDV.L
1.3%
VHYL.L
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYL.L
VHYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBDV.LVHYL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.57

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.69

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

13.31

-3.81

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBDV.L and VHYL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBDV.L drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, which is greater than VHYL.L's maximum drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDV.L and VHYL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBDV.LVHYL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.46%

-27.87%

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

-6.95%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.57%

-12.79%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

-12.79%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.77%

-27.87%

-6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-3.58%

-7.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.93%

+0.03%

Volatility

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) at 1.92%. This indicates that GBDV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBDV.LVHYL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

1.92%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

6.95%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

8.65%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

10.76%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.05%

12.99%

+1.06%

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBDV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBDV.L vs. VHYL.L - Dividend Comparison

GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than VHYL.L's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
3.72%4.21%3.80%4.25%4.26%3.68%3.91%3.60%3.87%3.28%3.49%3.73%
VHYL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.53%2.79%3.08%3.37%3.67%3.08%3.28%3.34%3.63%3.09%2.88%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBDV.L and VHYL.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHYL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHYL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.

GBDV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VHYL.L is Dividend. GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index, while VHYL.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GBDV.L and 0.29% for VHYL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBDV.L and VHYL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer