PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBDV.L is traded in GBP, while SPYL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBDV.L achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPYL.L's 10.73% return.


GBDV.L

1D
0.56%
1M
0.73%
YTD
7.03%
6M
7.39%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
7.98%

SPYL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.43%
YTD
10.73%
6M
10.28%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
7.03%10.06%9.77%12.37%
SPYL.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.80%9.03%27.52%9.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GBDV.L and SPYL.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.37

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GBDV.L
SPYL.L

Financial Services

24.9%
11.8%

Utilities

15.9%
2.3%

Real Estate

12.1%
1.9%

Industrials

11.5%
8.3%

Communication Services

9.5%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
4.9%

Energy

7.3%
3.5%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
10.1%

Technology

2.2%
35.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

GBDV.L
24.9%
SPYL.L
11.8%

Utilities

GBDV.L
15.9%
SPYL.L
2.3%

Real Estate

GBDV.L
12.1%
SPYL.L
1.9%

Industrials

GBDV.L
11.5%
SPYL.L
8.3%

Communication Services

GBDV.L
9.5%
SPYL.L
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

GBDV.L
8.0%
SPYL.L
4.9%

Energy

GBDV.L
7.3%
SPYL.L
3.5%

Healthcare

GBDV.L
4.2%
SPYL.L
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GBDV.L
2.4%
SPYL.L
10.1%

Technology

GBDV.L
2.2%
SPYL.L
35.6%

Basic Materials

GBDV.L
2.0%
SPYL.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.L
SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBDV.LSPYL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.96

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.91

13.51

-3.59

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBDV.L and SPYL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBDV.LSPYL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.42

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.55

-0.90

Drawdowns

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBDV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than SPYL.L's maximum drawdown of -21.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDV.L and SPYL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBDV.LSPYL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.77%

-21.16%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-7.21%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.28%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-2.95%

-2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.13%

-0.20%

Volatility

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) is 2.26%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that GBDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBDV.LSPYL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

3.48%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

8.60%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

11.82%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

14.13%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.13%

14.13%

0.00%

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBDV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBDV.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison

GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while SPYL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
4.50%4.91%4.49%4.87%5.05%4.26%4.41%4.41%5.18%4.26%4.74%5.72%
SPYL.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBDV.L and SPYL.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.

GBDV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPYL.L is S&P 500. GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index, while SPYL.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GBDV.L and 0.03% for SPYL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBDV.L and SPYL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer