GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L
GBDV.L (SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - GBDV.L tracks the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index while JPLG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBDV.L returned 7.43%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for JPLG.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GBDV.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.
Performance
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GBDV.L is traded in GBP, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBDV.L achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.
GBDV.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 19.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
JPLG.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 22.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBDV.L SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 7.03% | 10.06% | 9.77% | 1.90% | 5.38% | 17.41% | -11.68% | 1.87% |
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.77% | 10.11% | 12.09% | 7.05% | 0.72% | 24.67% | 2.57% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBDV.L and JPLG.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GBDV.L and JPLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Financial Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Utilities
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Real Estate
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Industrials
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Communication Services
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Defensive
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Energy
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Healthcare
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Cyclical
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Technology
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Basic Materials
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBDV.L
JPLG.L
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBDV.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.52 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 4.09 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.91 | 15.27 | -5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBDV.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.90 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.95 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.69 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBDV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than JPLG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDV.L and JPLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBDV.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.77% | -27.53% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -5.59% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.42% | -13.65% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -13.65% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | 0.00% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -3.30% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.50% | +0.43% |
Volatility
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that GBDV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBDV.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 1.96% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 5.88% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 7.87% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.74% | 10.90% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.13% | 13.75% | +0.38% |
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBDV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBDV.L SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 4.50% | 4.91% | 4.49% | 4.87% | 5.05% | 4.26% | 4.41% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 4.26% | 4.74% | 5.72% |
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBDV.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.
GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GBDV.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.
Find the right allocation for GBDV.L and JPLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer