PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBDV.L is traded in GBP, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBDV.L achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.


GBDV.L

1D
0.56%
1M
0.73%
YTD
7.03%
6M
7.39%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
7.98%

JPLG.L

1D
0.01%
1M
3.40%
YTD
10.77%
6M
11.42%
1Y
22.95%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
7.03%10.06%9.77%1.90%5.38%17.41%-11.68%1.87%
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
10.77%10.11%12.09%7.05%0.72%24.67%2.57%-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GBDV.L and JPLG.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.83

The correlation between GBDV.L and JPLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GBDV.L
JPLG.L

Financial Services

24.9%
11.3%

Utilities

15.9%
9.3%

Real Estate

12.1%
7.5%

Industrials

11.5%
10.5%

Communication Services

9.5%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
8.4%

Energy

7.3%
8.4%

Healthcare

4.2%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
7.9%

Technology

2.2%
10.7%

Basic Materials

2.0%
8.1%

Financial Services

GBDV.L
24.9%
JPLG.L
11.3%

Utilities

GBDV.L
15.9%
JPLG.L
9.3%

Real Estate

GBDV.L
12.1%
JPLG.L
7.5%

Industrials

GBDV.L
11.5%
JPLG.L
10.5%

Communication Services

GBDV.L
9.5%
JPLG.L
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

GBDV.L
8.0%
JPLG.L
8.4%

Energy

GBDV.L
7.3%
JPLG.L
8.4%

Healthcare

GBDV.L
4.2%
JPLG.L
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GBDV.L
2.4%
JPLG.L
7.9%

Technology

GBDV.L
2.2%
JPLG.L
10.7%

Basic Materials

GBDV.L
2.0%
JPLG.L
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBDV.LJPLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.52

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

4.09

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.91

15.27

-5.36

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBDV.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBDV.LJPLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.90

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.95

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.69

-0.04

Drawdowns

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBDV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than JPLG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDV.L and JPLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBDV.LJPLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.77%

-27.53%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-5.59%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.42%

-13.65%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-13.65%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

0.00%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-3.30%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.50%

+0.43%

Volatility

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that GBDV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBDV.LJPLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

1.96%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

5.88%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

7.87%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

10.90%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.13%

13.75%

+0.38%

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBDV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBDV.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
4.50%4.91%4.49%4.87%5.05%4.26%4.41%4.41%5.18%4.26%4.74%5.72%
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBDV.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.

GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GBDV.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBDV.L and JPLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer