GBATX vs. GABFX
GBATX (GMO Strategic Opportunities Allocation Fund) and GABFX (GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - GBATX is a Global Allocation fund managed by GMO, while GABFX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by GMO. Over the past 10 years, GBATX returned 9.04%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GABFX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.32% expense ratio.
Performance
GBATX vs. GABFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBATX achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than GABFX's -5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GBATX has outperformed GABFX with an annualized return of 9.04%, while GABFX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.20% annualized return.
GBATX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
GABFX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- -0.53%
- 3Y*
- -1.86%
- 5Y*
- -3.98%
- 10Y*
- 0.20%
GBATX vs. GABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBATX GMO Strategic Opportunities Allocation Fund | 12.10% | 24.71% | 5.50% | 17.36% | -11.27% | 12.12% | 4.83% | 19.59% | -9.41% | 19.30% |
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | -5.99% | 8.82% | -12.60% | 8.33% | -14.86% | 1.34% | 11.28% | 8.00% | 0.78% | 2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBATX and GABFX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2009 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, GBATX and GABFX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBATX vs. GABFX — Risk / Return Rank
GBATX
GABFX
GBATX vs. GABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Strategic Opportunities Allocation Fund (GBATX) and GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBATX | GABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.00 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | -0.06 | +3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | -0.14 | +13.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBATX vs. GABFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBATX drawdown since its inception was -35.37%, which is greater than GABFX's maximum drawdown of -27.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBATX and GABFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBATX | GABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.37% | -27.84% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.06% | -9.58% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.98% | -19.48% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -27.84% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.68% | -27.84% | -1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -19.54% | +18.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -7.37% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 4.23% | -2.34% |
Volatility
GBATX vs. GABFX - Volatility Comparison
GMO Strategic Opportunities Allocation Fund (GBATX) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) at 2.54%. This indicates that GBATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBATX | GABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 2.54% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 6.67% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 9.96% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 14.05% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.01% | 10.38% | +1.63% |
GBATX vs. GABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GBATX and GABFX have an expense ratio of 0.32%.
Dividends
GBATX vs. GABFX - Dividend Comparison
GBATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.64%, more than GABFX's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | 2.92% | 2.69% | 4.19% | 5.03% | 0.71% | 1.81% | 1.20% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 7.43% |
GBATX GMO Strategic Opportunities Allocation Fund | 15.64% | 13.65% | 5.97% | 6.04% | 10.08% | 24.22% | 4.29% | 5.17% | 9.77% | 2.98% | 2.84% | 9.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBATX and GABFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBATX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to GABFX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBATX dropped -35.37% vs GABFX's -27.84%.
GBATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBATX and GABFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer