GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE
GASF.DE (Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc) and 3SUD.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Acc) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - GASF.DE tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index while 3SUD.DE tracks the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GASF.DE returned 3.49%/yr vs -0.52%/yr for 3SUD.DE. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. GASF.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for 3SUD.DE.
Performance
GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GASF.DE achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than 3SUD.DE's 0.76% return.
GASF.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 8.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- —
3SUD.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GASF.DE Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc | 7.80% | -6.82% | 10.85% | -2.28% | 0.91% | 16.54% | -0.76% | -8.22% |
3SUD.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 0.76% | 11.46% | 3.74% | 7.58% | -20.68% | -3.62% | 3.56% | 1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GASF.DE and 3SUD.DE is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019 | -0.19 |
The correlation between GASF.DE and 3SUD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (3 years) to -0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GASF.DE
3SUD.DE
GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Acc (3SUD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GASF.DE | 3SUD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 1.54 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 6.42 | +1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GASF.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.75%, smaller than the maximum 3SUD.DE drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GASF.DE and 3SUD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GASF.DE | 3SUD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -30.80% | +17.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.40% | -4.88% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.00% | -7.73% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.75% | -30.55% | +16.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -4.17% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -11.05% | +5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 1.17% | -0.05% |
Volatility
GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Acc (3SUD.DE) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GASF.DE | 3SUD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.24% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.44% | 5.62% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 6.39% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 9.03% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 10.56% | -2.85% |
GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GASF.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than 3SUD.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GASF.DE vs. 3SUD.DE - Dividend Comparison
GASF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while 3SUD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3SUD.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GASF.DE Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc | 1.99% | 2.36% | 2.35% | 2.63% | 2.73% | 2.40% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GASF.DE and 3SUD.DE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GASF.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GASF.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for 3SUD.DE.
GASF.DE tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index, while 3SUD.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for GASF.DE and 0.50% for 3SUD.DE.
Find the right allocation for GASF.DE and 3SUD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer