PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARTX vs. SICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARTX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A (GARTX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARTX achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than SICIX's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, GARTX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 5.26%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.47% annualized return.


GARTX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.83%
YTD
6.55%
6M
6.98%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
5.26%

SICIX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARTX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GARTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A
6.55%9.36%6.62%10.45%-6.61%6.06%3.30%10.36%-2.80%6.93%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.55%8.12%5.52%5.29%-6.23%4.13%2.62%9.36%-2.07%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GARTX and SICIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2008

0.69

The correlation between GARTX and SICIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARTX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARTX
GARTX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GARTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GARTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARTX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A (GARTX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GARTXSICIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.48

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.63

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.01

10.22

+4.79

GARTX vs. SICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the SICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARTX and SICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GARTXSICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.49

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.85

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.90

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.80

-0.35

Drawdowns

GARTX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARTX drawdown since its inception was -19.12%, smaller than the maximum SICIX drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARTX and SICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARTXSICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.12%

-27.62%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-2.65%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-3.21%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.17%

-10.94%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.24%

-11.61%

-1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-3.57%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.68%

+0.30%

Volatility

GARTX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A (GARTX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.74%. This indicates that GARTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARTXSICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

0.74%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

2.11%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.64%

2.80%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.69%

3.88%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.49%

3.90%

+2.59%

GARTX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARTX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARTX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison

GARTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than SICIX's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GARTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A
1.76%1.87%0.81%2.49%5.02%9.26%0.63%3.33%2.38%3.58%0.41%1.37%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.83%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARTX and SICIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARTX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to SICIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARTX dropped -19.12% vs SICIX's -27.62%.

GARTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARTX and SICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer