PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARTX vs. DGIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARTX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A (GARTX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARTX achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GARTX has underperformed DGIFX with an annualized return of 5.26%, while DGIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.


GARTX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.83%
YTD
6.55%
6M
6.98%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
5.26%

DGIFX

1D
0.76%
1M
6.56%
YTD
17.45%
6M
16.09%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARTX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GARTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A
6.55%9.36%6.62%10.45%-6.61%6.06%3.30%10.36%-2.80%6.93%
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
17.45%3.54%21.13%33.10%-18.35%9.59%24.07%23.97%-2.39%14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GARTX and DGIFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2011

0.82

The correlation between GARTX and DGIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARTX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARTX
GARTX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GARTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GARTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DGIFX
DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARTX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A (GARTX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GARTXDGIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

1.80

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

2.50

+1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.31

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.55

+0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.01

7.92

+7.09

GARTX vs. DGIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the DGIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARTX and DGIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GARTXDGIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.80

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.50

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.67

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.71

-0.26

Drawdowns

GARTX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARTX drawdown since its inception was -19.12%, smaller than the maximum DGIFX drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARTX and DGIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARTXDGIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.12%

-30.93%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-10.91%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-30.93%

+22.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.17%

-30.93%

+19.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.24%

-30.93%

+17.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-5.90%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

3.50%

-2.52%

Volatility

GARTX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A (GARTX) is 1.50%, while Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that GARTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARTXDGIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

4.23%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

11.14%

-6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.64%

15.47%

-9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.69%

21.11%

-14.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.49%

18.66%

-12.17%

GARTX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARTX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARTX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison

GARTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than DGIFX's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
7.02%8.29%20.95%2.78%2.21%11.12%10.09%3.53%3.74%4.29%0.00%0.00%
GARTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Class A
1.76%1.87%0.81%2.49%5.02%9.26%0.63%3.33%2.38%3.58%0.41%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARTX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGIFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to GARTX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARTX dropped -19.12% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.

GARTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARTX and DGIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer