GARP vs. GRPZ
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and GRPZ (Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while GRPZ is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GARP returned 46.14% vs 24.87% for GRPZ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GRPZ.
Performance
GARP vs. GRPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than GRPZ's 11.59% return.
GARP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
GRPZ
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 11.26%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARP vs. GRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 22.17% | 21.49% | 18.67% |
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF | 11.59% | 3.09% | 4.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and GRPZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between GARP and GRPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
GARP vs. GRPZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
GRPZ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
GRPZ
Communication Services
GARP
GRPZ
Financial Services
GARP
GRPZ
Industrials
GARP
GRPZ
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
GRPZ
Healthcare
GARP
GRPZ
Energy
GARP
GRPZ
Utilities
GARP
GRPZ
-
Basic Materials
GARP
GRPZ
Real Estate
GARP
GRPZ
-
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
GRPZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. GRPZ — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
GRPZ
GARP vs. GRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GARP | GRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.41 | +1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 2.19 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.24 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 2.58 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | 7.42 | +6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARP | GRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.41 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.41 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
GARP vs. GRPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than GRPZ's maximum drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and GRPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | GRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -27.87% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -9.53% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -2.92% | +2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -7.01% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.31% | +0.09% |
Volatility
GARP vs. GRPZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | GRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 4.71% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 11.84% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 17.69% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 21.19% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 21.19% | +2.71% |
GARP vs. GRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GRPZ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. GRPZ - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than GRPZ's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF | 0.91% | 0.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and GRPZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GRPZ (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs GRPZ's -27.87%.
On 1-year performance, GARP leads with 46.14% vs 24.87% for GRPZ. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GRPZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GARP has performed better with a 46.14% return vs 24.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPZ.
GRPZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GRPZ is Small Cap Growth Equities. GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while GRPZ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.35% for GRPZ.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and GRPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer