PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. GRPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. GRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than GRPZ's 11.59% return.


GARP

1D
-0.01%
1M
12.94%
YTD
22.17%
6M
23.18%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
33.92%
5Y*
20.74%
10Y*

GRPZ

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.26%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. GRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
22.17%21.49%18.67%
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
11.59%3.09%4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and GRPZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024

0.60

The correlation between GARP and GRPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

GARP vs. GRPZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GARP
GRPZ

Technology

56.7%
7.9%

Communication Services

12.0%
0.9%

Financial Services

7.5%
28.0%

Industrials

6.9%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
12.0%

Healthcare

5.4%
14.4%

Energy

2.7%
13.0%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

5.3%

Technology

GARP
56.7%
GRPZ
7.9%

Communication Services

GARP
12.0%
GRPZ
0.9%

Financial Services

GARP
7.5%
GRPZ
28.0%

Industrials

GARP
6.9%
GRPZ
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GARP
6.1%
GRPZ
12.0%

Healthcare

GARP
5.4%
GRPZ
14.4%

Energy

GARP
2.7%
GRPZ
13.0%

Utilities

GARP
1.4%
GRPZ

-

Basic Materials

GARP
0.9%
GRPZ
2.2%

Real Estate

GARP
0.4%
GRPZ

-

Consumer Defensive

GARP

-

GRPZ
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. GRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GRPZ
GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. GRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GARPGRPZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

1.41

+1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

2.19

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.24

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.58

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.74

7.42

+6.32

GARP vs. GRPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the GRPZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and GRPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GARPGRPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.41

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.41

+0.49

Drawdowns

GARP vs. GRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than GRPZ's maximum drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and GRPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPGRPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-27.87%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-9.53%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-2.92%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-7.01%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.31%

+0.09%

Volatility

GARP vs. GRPZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPGRPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

4.71%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

11.84%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

17.69%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

21.19%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

21.19%

+2.71%

GARP vs. GRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GRPZ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARP vs. GRPZ - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than GRPZ's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
0.91%0.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and GRPZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GRPZ (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs GRPZ's -27.87%.

On 1-year performance, GARP leads with 46.14% vs 24.87% for GRPZ. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GRPZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GARP has performed better with a 46.14% return vs 24.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPZ.

GRPZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.

GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GRPZ is Small Cap Growth Equities. GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while GRPZ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.35% for GRPZ.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and GRPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer