PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 18.49% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.


GARP

1D
-1.09%
1M
1.30%
6M
15.03%
YTD
18.49%
1Y
33.27%
3Y*
29.83%
5Y*
17.98%
10Y*

SBIT

1D
5.38%
1M
1.44%
6M
58.27%
YTD
44.00%
1Y
124.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
18.49%21.49%18.54%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
44.00%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and SBIT is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARPSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.60

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

5.92

+3.37

GARP vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARP vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-91.35%

+60.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-47.94%

+34.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-77.15%

+74.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-68.83%

+61.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

21.04%

-17.45%

Volatility

GARP vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) is 7.32%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that GARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

22.98%

-15.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

68.89%

-53.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

88.51%

-68.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.29%

96.89%

-74.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.95%

96.89%

-72.94%

GARP vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARP vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.97%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and SBIT have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to GARP (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 33.27% for GARP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 7.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 33.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.

GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.95% for SBIT.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer