PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAPR vs. FDND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAPR vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPR achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's 2.42% return.


GAPR

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.03%
YTD
4.16%
6M
4.90%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
10Y*

FDND

1D
-1.99%
1M
3.57%
YTD
2.42%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPR vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GAPR and FDND is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

0.63

The correlation between GAPR and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAPR vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPR
GAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPR vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAPRFDNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

1.08

+0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.94

0.36

+11.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

62.55

0.88

+61.67

GAPR vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPR and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAPRFDNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97

0.40

+3.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

0.60

+1.04

Drawdowns

GAPR vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPR drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPR and FDND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPRFDNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-24.12%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.88%

-20.49%

+19.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-4.24%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-5.67%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

8.39%

-8.22%

Volatility

GAPR vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) is 0.93%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that GAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPRFDNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

5.29%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

14.07%

-12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

18.28%

-15.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.03%

21.40%

-14.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

21.40%

-14.37%

GAPR vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAPR vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

GAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GAPR and FDND have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to GAPR (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPR dropped -8.98% vs FDND's -24.12%.

On 1-year performance, GAPR leads with 10.42% vs 7.37% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GAPR has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAPR.

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 0.00% for GAPR.

GAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAPR and 0.75% for FDND.

GAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAPR and FDND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer