PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAPAX vs. SSGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAPAX vs. SSGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPAX achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than SSGLX's 14.98% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPAX has outperformed SSGLX with an annualized return of 13.13%, while SSGLX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.


GAPAX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.12%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.72%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
13.13%

SSGLX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.89%
YTD
14.98%
6M
18.09%
1Y
32.74%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPAX vs. SSGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAPAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A
12.32%21.27%24.08%20.25%-19.30%20.10%13.19%31.33%-11.39%25.97%
SSGLX
State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K
14.98%32.64%4.98%15.67%-16.44%8.36%11.11%21.52%-14.05%27.12%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPAX and SSGLX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014

0.82

The correlation between GAPAX and SSGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAPAX vs. SSGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPAX
GAPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GAPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GAPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SSGLX
SSGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SSGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SSGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPAX vs. SSGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAPAXSSGLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.40

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

3.35

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.89

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.82

11.22

+2.60

GAPAX vs. SSGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SSGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPAX and SSGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAPAXSSGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.40

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.59

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.61

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.45

-0.04

Drawdowns

GAPAX vs. SSGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPAX drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, which is greater than SSGLX's maximum drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPAX and SSGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPAXSSGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.88%

-35.88%

-23.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-11.22%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-13.56%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.13%

-30.08%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-35.88%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-8.23%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.88%

-0.58%

Volatility

GAPAX vs. SSGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) is 3.85%, while State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that GAPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPAXSSGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.55%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

11.38%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

13.56%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

14.74%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

16.24%

+1.76%

GAPAX vs. SSGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SSGLX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAPAX vs. SSGLX - Dividend Comparison

GAPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.86%, more than SSGLX's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAPAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A
12.86%14.45%14.69%5.01%6.35%12.40%2.34%9.86%2.64%1.96%1.16%0.97%
SSGLX
State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K
3.84%4.41%4.46%2.98%2.85%4.20%1.72%4.80%8.32%3.98%1.52%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAPAX and SSGLX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSGLX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to GAPAX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPAX dropped -58.88% vs SSGLX's -35.88%.

GAPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAPAX and SSGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer