GAPAX vs. PGVFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GAPAX (Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A) and PGVFX (Polaris Global Value Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GAPAX returned 13.17%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for PGVFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GAPAX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PGVFX.

Performance

GAPAX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPAX achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 19.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPAX has outperformed PGVFX with an annualized return of 13.17%, while PGVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.88% annualized return.

GAPAX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 13.73%
• 1Y: 30.65%
• 3Y*: 22.83%
• 5Y*: 11.89%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

PGVFX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 19.64%
• 6M: 23.13%
• 1Y: 38.95%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: 9.53%
• 10Y*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPAX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GAPAX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A	12.72%	21.27%	24.08%	20.25%	-19.30%	20.10%	13.19%	31.33%	-11.39%	25.97%
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund	19.64%	27.01%	5.33%	14.76%	-12.00%	15.38%	6.65%	22.83%	-12.64%	20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPAX and PGVFX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1998	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between GAPAX and PGVFX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GAPAX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPAX

GAPAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
GAPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
GAPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GAPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
GAPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GAPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

PGVFX

PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 90
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPAX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAPAX	PGVFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	3.32	-0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	4.65	-1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.63	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	4.46	-1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.53	16.13	-2.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GAPAX vs. PGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the PGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPAX and PGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAPAX	PGVFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	3.32	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.69	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.69	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.49	-0.09

Drawdowns

GAPAX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPAX drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPAX and PGVFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAPAX	PGVFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.88%	-68.09%	+9.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.28%	-8.76%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.34%	-12.53%	-5.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.13%	-27.58%	-3.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.31%	-41.26%	+4.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-11.30%	-0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	2.42%	-0.12%

Volatility

GAPAX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) is 3.85%, while Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that GAPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAPAX	PGVFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	4.10%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	9.55%	+0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.10%	11.75%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	13.80%	+3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	15.87%	+2.13%

GAPAX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAPAX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison

GAPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.82%, more than PGVFX's 4.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAPAX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A	12.82%	14.45%	14.69%	5.01%	6.35%	12.40%	2.34%	9.86%	2.64%	1.96%	1.16%	0.97%
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund	4.32%	5.17%	5.65%	1.68%	3.55%	4.05%	1.55%	3.69%	3.39%	1.50%	1.32%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAPAX and PGVFX in my portfolio?

GAPAX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAPAX or PGVFX?

PGVFX has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to GAPAX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPAX dropped -58.88% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.