PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAPAX vs. PGTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAPAX vs. PGTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class (PGTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPAX achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly lower than PGTIX's 43.00% return.


GAPAX

1D
0.35%
1M
6.02%
YTD
12.72%
6M
13.73%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
13.17%

PGTIX

1D
-0.85%
1M
19.70%
YTD
43.00%
6M
42.41%
1Y
78.63%
3Y*
39.87%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPAX vs. PGTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAPAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A
12.72%21.27%24.08%20.25%-19.30%20.10%13.19%31.33%-11.39%24.99%
PGTIX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class
43.00%27.48%33.33%56.25%-55.48%8.92%75.98%34.28%-9.95%45.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPAX and PGTIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.78

The correlation between GAPAX and PGTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAPAX vs. PGTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPAX
GAPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GAPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GAPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PGTIX
PGTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PGTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPAX vs. PGTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class (PGTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAPAXPGTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.56

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

6.08

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

19.22

-5.69

GAPAX vs. PGTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the PGTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPAX and PGTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAPAXPGTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

3.42

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.38

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.70

-0.30

Drawdowns

GAPAX vs. PGTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPAX drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, smaller than the maximum PGTIX drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPAX and PGTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPAXPGTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.88%

-65.26%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-12.99%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-26.71%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.13%

-65.26%

+34.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.85%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-19.00%

+7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

4.11%

-1.81%

Volatility

GAPAX vs. PGTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) is 3.85%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class (PGTIX) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that GAPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPAXPGTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

8.44%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

18.73%

-8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

23.12%

-10.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

31.79%

-14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

28.95%

-10.95%

GAPAX vs. PGTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PGTIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAPAX vs. PGTIX - Dividend Comparison

GAPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.82%, while PGTIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAPAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A
12.82%14.45%14.69%5.01%6.35%12.40%2.34%9.86%2.64%1.96%1.16%0.97%
PGTIX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.27%27.92%5.04%0.07%24.92%15.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAPAX and PGTIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGTIX has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to GAPAX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPAX dropped -58.88% vs PGTIX's -65.26%.

PGTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAPAX and PGTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer