PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAPAX vs. GAOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAPAX vs. GAOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPAX achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than GAOAX's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPAX has outperformed GAOAX with an annualized return of 13.17%, while GAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.50% annualized return.


GAPAX

1D
0.35%
1M
6.02%
YTD
12.72%
6M
13.73%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
13.17%

GAOAX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.44%
YTD
5.47%
6M
6.01%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPAX vs. GAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAPAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A
12.72%21.27%24.08%20.25%-19.30%20.10%13.19%31.33%-11.39%25.97%
GAOAX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A
5.47%14.68%7.91%12.69%-18.74%3.60%15.29%15.95%-6.07%16.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPAX and GAOAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2013

0.96

The correlation between GAPAX and GAOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAPAX vs. GAOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPAX
GAPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GAPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GAPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GAOAX
GAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPAX vs. GAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAPAXGAOAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

1.62

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

2.28

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.75

+1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.53

6.98

+6.55

GAPAX vs. GAOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the GAOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPAX and GAOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAPAXGAOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.62

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.28

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.60

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.61

-0.20

Drawdowns

GAPAX vs. GAOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPAX drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, which is greater than GAOAX's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPAX and GAOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPAXGAOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.88%

-29.02%

-29.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-8.95%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-10.87%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.13%

-29.02%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-29.02%

-7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-5.96%

-5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.24%

+0.06%

Volatility

GAPAX vs. GAOAX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) at 2.81%. This indicates that GAPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPAXGAOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

2.81%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

7.96%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

9.70%

+3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

11.10%

+5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

10.88%

+7.12%

GAPAX vs. GAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than GAOAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAPAX vs. GAOAX - Dividend Comparison

GAPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.82%, more than GAOAX's 9.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAOAX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A
9.15%10.15%2.34%0.00%4.62%4.61%1.54%2.43%2.52%2.95%2.59%0.96%
GAPAX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A
12.82%14.45%14.69%5.01%6.35%12.40%2.34%9.86%2.64%1.96%1.16%0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GAPAX and GAOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GAPAX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to GAOAX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPAX dropped -58.88% vs GAOAX's -29.02%.

GAPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAPAX and GAOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer