PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAOAX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAOAX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAOAX achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 11.60% return.


GAOAX

1D
1.67%
1M
-0.70%
6M
0.44%
YTD
2.81%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
5.98%
ALL TIME*
5.95%

GQFPX

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.13%
6M
4.87%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GAOAX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GAOAX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A
2.81%14.68%7.91%12.69%-18.74%-2.59%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
11.60%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GAOAX and GQFPX is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between GAOAX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAOAX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GAOAX
GAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GAOAX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAOAXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

2.80

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

7.14

-3.34

GAOAX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAOAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAOAX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAOAX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAOAX drawdown since its inception was -29.02%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAOAX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAOAXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.02%

-16.95%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-6.28%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-10.57%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-16.95%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-1.46%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-3.03%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.45%

-0.06%

Volatility

GAOAX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.28%. This indicates that GAOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAOAXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.28%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

8.32%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

10.18%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

12.78%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.93%

12.81%

-1.88%

GAOAX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAOAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAOAX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

GAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, more than GQFPX's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAOAX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A
9.06%10.15%2.34%0.00%4.62%4.61%1.54%2.43%2.52%2.95%2.59%0.96%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.52%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAOAX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAOAX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to GQFPX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAOAX dropped -29.02% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAOAX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer