GAMPX vs. TMLPX
GAMPX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P) and TMLPX (Transamerica Energy Infrastructure) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GAMPX returned 25.11%/yr vs 16.60%/yr for TMLPX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. GAMPX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for TMLPX.
Performance
GAMPX vs. TMLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GAMPX having a 26.95% return and TMLPX slightly lower at 25.97%.
GAMPX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 19.67%
- YTD
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 29.64%
- 3Y*
- 30.89%
- 5Y*
- 25.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.03%
TMLPX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 1Y
- 27.38%
- 3Y*
- 23.04%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GAMPX vs. TMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P | 26.95% | 5.43% | 58.40% | 15.11% | 19.15% | 38.33% | -17.23% | 17.00% | -12.69% |
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 25.97% | 3.87% | 38.51% | 5.07% | 9.12% | 23.54% | -11.25% | 15.66% | -10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAMPX and TMLPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between GAMPX and TMLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAMPX vs. TMLPX — Risk / Return Rank
GAMPX
TMLPX
GAMPX vs. TMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAMPX | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.80 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 9.61 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAMPX vs. TMLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAMPX drawdown since its inception was -59.18%, smaller than the maximum TMLPX drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMPX and TMLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAMPX | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.18% | -67.18% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -7.12% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.08% | -16.60% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.97% | -16.60% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -2.71% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -22.33% | +13.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.81% | +0.36% |
Volatility
GAMPX vs. TMLPX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAMPX | TMLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 5.34% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 11.65% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.88% | 14.35% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 17.25% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 21.79% | +3.90% |
GAMPX vs. TMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAMPX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than TMLPX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAMPX vs. TMLPX - Dividend Comparison
GAMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than TMLPX's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P | 8.26% | 10.13% | 25.55% | 10.34% | 4.76% | 8.54% | 4.33% | 4.99% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 3.78% | 4.33% | 3.71% | 7.34% | 4.83% | 4.33% | 6.09% | 5.65% | 6.10% | 5.51% | 3.95% | 5.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GAMPX and TMLPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TMLPX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to GAMPX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMPX dropped -59.18% vs TMLPX's -67.18%.
GAMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAMPX and TMLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer