GAMB vs. QBTS
GAMB (Gambling.com Group Limited) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. GAMB operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, GAMB returned -45.51%/yr vs 103.94%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GAMB vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAMB achieves a -65.38% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's -28.64% return.
GAMB
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -21.90%
- 6M
- -63.30%
- YTD
- -65.38%
- 1Y
- -83.61%
- 3Y*
- -45.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS
- 1D
- -7.12%
- 1M
- -20.15%
- 6M
- -35.21%
- YTD
- -28.64%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 103.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAMB vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMB Gambling.com Group Limited | -65.38% | -61.22% | 44.41% | 6.56% | 10.51% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -28.64% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAMB and QBTS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
GAMB:
$66.62M
QBTS:
$6.86B
GAMB:
-$1.29
QBTS:
-$1.04
GAMB:
0.40
QBTS:
531.13
GAMB:
0.62
QBTS:
6.10
GAMB:
$165.25M
QBTS:
$12.44M
GAMB:
$142.33M
QBTS:
$8.25M
GAMB:
-$20.14M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAMB vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
GAMB
QBTS
GAMB vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAMB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.59 | 1.13 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 0.37 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 0.61 | -2.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAMB vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAMB drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMB and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAMB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -96.67% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.83% | -71.01% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.72% | -79.17% | -9.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.72% | -58.33% | -30.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.71% | -65.34% | +22.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.08% | 42.79% | +13.29% |
Volatility
GAMB vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) is 17.96%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 24.70%. This indicates that GAMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAMB | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.96% | 24.70% | -6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.42% | 73.85% | -10.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.61% | 109.96% | -44.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.98% | 150.05% | -83.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.98% | 150.05% | -83.07% |
Dividends
GAMB vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAMB nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GAMB vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gambling.com Group Limited and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GAMB and QBTS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (24.70%) compared to GAMB (17.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMB dropped -88.72% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAMB and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer