GAMB vs. NKE
GAMB (Gambling.com Group Limited) and NKE (NIKE, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — GAMB in Gambling, NKE in Footwear & Accessories. Over the past 3 years, GAMB returned -39.09%/yr vs -25.60%/yr for NKE. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GAMB vs. NKE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAMB achieves a -59.16% return, which is significantly lower than NKE's -32.44% return.
GAMB
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -59.16%
- 6M
- -58.00%
- 1Y
- -81.04%
- 3Y*
- -39.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NKE
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -32.44%
- 6M
- -24.93%
- 1Y
- -28.36%
- 3Y*
- -25.60%
- 5Y*
- -19.19%
- 10Y*
- -0.78%
GAMB vs. NKE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMB Gambling.com Group Limited | -59.16% | -61.22% | 44.41% | 6.56% | -9.85% | 23.03% |
NKE NIKE, Inc. | -32.44% | -13.83% | -29.11% | -6.01% | -29.04% | 2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAMB and NKE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between GAMB and NKE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GAMB:
$78.55M
NKE:
$62.74B
GAMB:
-$1.29
NKE:
$1.52
GAMB:
0.48
NKE:
1.35
GAMB:
0.73
NKE:
4.45
GAMB:
$165.25M
NKE:
$46.52B
GAMB:
$142.33M
NKE:
$18.99B
GAMB:
-$20.14M
NKE:
$3.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAMB vs. NKE — Risk / Return Rank
GAMB
NKE
GAMB vs. NKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAMB | NKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.61 | 0.88 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.62 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -1.12 | -0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAMB vs. NKE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAMB drawdown since its inception was -86.69%, which is greater than NKE's maximum drawdown of -75.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMB and NKE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAMB | NKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.69% | -75.19% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.66% | -46.18% | -35.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.69% | -64.21% | -22.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -74.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.69% | -74.11% | -12.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.23% | -20.95% | -21.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.28% | 25.25% | +29.03% |
Volatility
GAMB vs. NKE - Volatility Comparison
Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to NIKE, Inc. (NKE) at 11.15%. This indicates that GAMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAMB | NKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 11.15% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.28% | 29.70% | +32.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.28% | 38.53% | +25.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.00% | 36.00% | +31.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.00% | 32.34% | +34.66% |
Dividends
GAMB vs. NKE - Dividend Comparison
GAMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMB Gambling.com Group Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NKE NIKE, Inc. | 3.85% | 2.53% | 2.00% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 1.11% | 1.18% | 1.30% | 0.93% |
Financials
GAMB vs. NKE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gambling.com Group Limited and NIKE, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GAMB vs. NKE - Profitability Comparison
GAMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gambling.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 30.54M and revenue of 40.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.5%.
NKE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
GAMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gambling.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 3.27M and revenue of 40.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
NKE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported an operating income of 553.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
GAMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gambling.com Group Limited reported a net income of -1.18M and revenue of 40.44M, resulting in a net margin of -2.9%.
NKE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GAMB and NKE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAMB has higher volatility (14.73%) compared to NKE (11.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMB dropped -86.69% vs NKE's -75.19%.
NKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAMB and NKE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer