PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAGEX vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAGEX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAGEX achieves a 29.54% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 34.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GAGEX has underperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 6.68%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.30% annualized return.


GAGEX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.84%
6M
23.42%
YTD
29.54%
1Y
40.78%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
19.31%
10Y*
6.68%

FSENX

1D
0.51%
1M
5.50%
6M
24.89%
YTD
34.10%
1Y
44.56%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
25.02%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAGEX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAGEX
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund
29.54%16.88%-1.75%2.66%34.32%45.96%-34.12%10.45%-18.96%-1.04%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
34.10%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GAGEX and FSENX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2004

0.94

The correlation between GAGEX and FSENX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAGEX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAGEX
GAGEX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GAGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GAGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAGEX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAGEXFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.71

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

10.09

-0.88

GAGEX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAGEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAGEX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAGEX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAGEX drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAGEX and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAGEXFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.90%

-76.24%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.14%

-12.22%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.67%

-25.85%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-28.02%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.98%

-72.11%

+2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.95%

-5.74%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.12%

-16.99%

-12.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

4.49%

-0.01%

Volatility

GAGEX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) at 5.97%. This indicates that GAGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAGEXFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

5.97%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

15.81%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

20.04%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

27.12%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.19%

30.84%

-3.65%

GAGEX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAGEX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAGEX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

GAGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than FSENX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.60%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%
GAGEX
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund
2.18%2.82%7.08%4.33%0.15%2.59%3.59%1.91%1.72%1.40%1.13%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GAGEX and FSENX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GAGEX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to FSENX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAGEX dropped -78.90% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAGEX and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer