GAGCX vs. GIPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund (GAGCX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX).
GAGCX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Feb 2, 1994. GIPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
GAGCX vs. GIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAGCX vs. GIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAGCX The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund | -0.79% | 22.11% | -0.99% | 9.93% | -15.66% | 21.32% | 11.68% | 14.38% | -14.01% | 20.91% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | -1.09% | 10.80% | 8.51% | 12.49% | -14.43% | 7.94% | 11.09% | 15.68% | -6.52% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAGCX achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly higher than GIPIX's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GAGCX has outperformed GIPIX with an annualized return of 6.52%, while GIPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.
GAGCX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
GIPIX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAGCX vs. GIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAGCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GIPIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAGCX vs. GIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
GAGCX
GIPIX
GAGCX vs. GIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund (GAGCX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAGCX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.82 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.23 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 5.36 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAGCX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.50 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.70 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.64 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAGCX and GIPIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAGCX vs. GIPIX - Dividend Comparison
GAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than GIPIX's 5.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAGCX The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund | 2.88% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 3.66% | 1.57% | 0.68% | 0.49% | 1.66% | 1.35% | 1.02% | 1.34% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.87% | 5.22% | 4.06% | 2.12% | 4.56% | 6.37% | 2.25% | 2.51% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.46% | 5.73% |
Drawdowns
GAGCX vs. GIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAGCX drawdown since its inception was -79.95%, which is greater than GIPIX's maximum drawdown of -29.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAGCX and GIPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAGCX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.95% | -29.46% | -50.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -6.33% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.38% | -20.65% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.89% | -20.65% | -17.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.60% | -4.20% | -27.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.49% | -3.70% | -41.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 1.64% | +1.00% |
Volatility
GAGCX vs. GIPIX - Volatility Comparison
The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund (GAGCX) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) at 3.36%. This indicates that GAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAGCX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.36% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 4.96% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 8.18% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 7.96% | +5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 8.07% | +6.10% |