PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAFFX vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GAFFX vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3 (GAFFX) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GAFFX vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GAFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
-11.16%20.09%28.41%19.85%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
4.90%49.85%30.98%19.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAFFX achieves a -11.16% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 4.90% return.


GAFFX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-9.63%
YTD
-11.16%
6M
-9.74%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*

CHAT

1D
4.72%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
4.90%
6M
3.42%
1Y
82.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GAFFX vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAFFX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GAFFX vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAFFX
GAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAFFX vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3 (GAFFX) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAFFXCHATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

2.42

-1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

3.04

-1.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.42

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

4.94

-4.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.04

13.74

-10.71

GAFFX vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAFFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAFFX and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAFFXCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.42

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.27

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between GAFFX and CHAT is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GAFFX vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

GAFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than CHAT's 2.72% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAFFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
12.39%11.00%9.30%7.71%4.45%8.50%4.58%7.47%12.37%7.36%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
2.72%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GAFFX vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAFFX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAFFX and CHAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GAFFXCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.19%

-31.34%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-16.28%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.71%

-6.73%

-6.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-5.61%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

5.85%

-2.30%

Volatility

GAFFX vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3 (GAFFX) is 5.47%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 13.21%. This indicates that GAFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GAFFXCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

13.21%

-7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

23.24%

-11.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.76%

34.27%

-13.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

29.27%

-9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

29.27%

-9.08%