GAEM vs. HIGH
GAEM (Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF) and HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAEM is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while HIGH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GAEM returned 13.15% vs -3.46% for HIGH. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAEM charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for HIGH.
Performance
GAEM vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAEM achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.38% return.
GAEM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 13.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIGH
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- 1Y
- -3.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAEM vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GAEM Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF | 3.26% | 13.55% | 3.72% |
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | -0.38% | 4.35% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAEM and HIGH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAEM vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank
GAEM
HIGH
GAEM vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAEM | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 0.94 | +0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | -0.37 | +4.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.69 | -0.53 | +17.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAEM | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | -0.39 | +3.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.33 | 0.39 | +1.94 |
Drawdowns
GAEM vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAEM drawdown since its inception was -3.84%, smaller than the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAEM and HIGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAEM | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -9.50% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.61% | -9.50% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -7.11% | +6.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -2.37% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 6.53% | -5.74% |
Volatility
GAEM vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) at 1.23%. This indicates that GAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAEM | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 1.23% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.74% | 3.50% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.71% | 8.83% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 9.56% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 9.56% | -4.60% |
GAEM vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAEM has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than HIGH's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAEM vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison
GAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than HIGH's 7.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAEM Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF | 7.54% | 6.50% | 3.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | 7.33% | 7.71% | 8.34% | 9.40% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAEM and HIGH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAEM has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to HIGH (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAEM dropped -3.84% vs HIGH's -9.50%.
On 1-year performance, GAEM leads with 13.15% vs -3.46% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GAEM has performed better with a 13.15% return vs -3.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for GAEM.
GAEM has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 7.33% for HIGH.
GAEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while HIGH is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for GAEM and 0.51% for HIGH.
GAEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAEM and HIGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer