PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAEM vs. HIGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAEM vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAEM achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.38% return.


GAEM

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.20%
YTD
3.26%
6M
4.63%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HIGH

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.63%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
-3.46%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAEM vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GAEM
Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF
3.26%13.55%3.72%
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
-0.38%4.35%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GAEM and HIGH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAEM vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAEM
GAEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAEM vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAEMHIGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

0.94

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

-0.37

+4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.69

-0.53

+17.22

GAEM vs. HIGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the HIGH Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAEM and HIGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAEMHIGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

-0.39

+3.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.33

0.39

+1.94

Drawdowns

GAEM vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAEM drawdown since its inception was -3.84%, smaller than the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAEM and HIGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAEMHIGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-9.50%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-9.50%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-7.11%

+6.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-2.37%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

6.53%

-5.74%

Volatility

GAEM vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) at 1.23%. This indicates that GAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAEMHIGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.23%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

3.50%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

8.83%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

9.56%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

9.56%

-4.60%

GAEM vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAEM has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than HIGH's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAEM vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison

GAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than HIGH's 7.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GAEM
Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF
7.54%6.50%3.78%0.00%0.00%
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.33%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAEM and HIGH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAEM has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to HIGH (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAEM dropped -3.84% vs HIGH's -9.50%.

On 1-year performance, GAEM leads with 13.15% vs -3.46% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GAEM has performed better with a 13.15% return vs -3.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for GAEM.

GAEM has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 7.33% for HIGH.

GAEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while HIGH is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for GAEM and 0.51% for HIGH.

GAEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAEM and HIGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer