PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GACA.DE achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than UBUR.DE's 0.53% return.


GACA.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.10%
YTD
10.44%
6M
10.26%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*

UBUR.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.77%
1Y
-1.23%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GACA.DE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)
10.44%3.94%29.59%21.02%-14.66%38.66%7.33%8.54%
UBUR.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.53%-5.64%20.63%2.15%-0.28%33.09%-5.58%2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GACA.DE and UBUR.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019

0.45

The correlation between GACA.DE and UBUR.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GACA.DE
GACA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GACA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

UBUR.DE
UBUR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UBUR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GACA.DEUBUR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.98

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

-0.28

+2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

-0.64

+8.72

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GACA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the UBUR.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GACA.DE and UBUR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GACA.DEUBUR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

-0.20

+1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.70

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.81

+0.03

Drawdowns

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GACA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum UBUR.DE drawdown of -35.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GACA.DE and UBUR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GACA.DEUBUR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.50%

-35.34%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-7.81%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.68%

-14.40%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-14.40%

-9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-11.30%

+10.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-7.34%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

9.86%

-7.29%

Volatility

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUR.DE) at 3.22%. This indicates that GACA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBUR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GACA.DEUBUR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.22%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

7.37%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

10.99%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.76%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

19.45%

-2.23%

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GACA.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than UBUR.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GACA.DE vs. UBUR.DE - Dividend Comparison

GACA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBUR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GACA.DE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUR.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.60%1.87%1.44%1.39%1.28%0.93%1.62%1.40%1.37%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


GACA.DE and UBUR.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GACA.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GACA.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UBUR.DE.

GACA.DE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity, while UBUR.DE tracks MSCI USA Select Dynamic 50% Risk Weighted. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GACA.DE and 0.18% for UBUR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GACA.DE and UBUR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer