PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GACA.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.10%
YTD
10.44%
6M
10.26%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*

IBCY.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GACA.DE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)
10.44%3.94%29.59%21.02%-14.66%38.66%7.33%8.54%
IBCY.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF
0.00%6.35%29.21%13.73%-11.70%36.60%0.17%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GACA.DE and IBCY.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between GACA.DE and IBCY.DE has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GACA.DE
GACA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GACA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCY.DE
IBCY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IBCY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GACA.DEIBCY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.56

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

4.08

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

19.99

-11.90

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GACA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the IBCY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GACA.DE and IBCY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GACA.DEIBCY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.70

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.69

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.63

+0.21

Drawdowns

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GACA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum IBCY.DE drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GACA.DE and IBCY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GACA.DEIBCY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.50%

-35.54%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-3.26%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.68%

-22.91%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-22.91%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-4.95%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

0.67%

+1.90%

Volatility

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that GACA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GACA.DEIBCY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

0.00%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

0.00%

+8.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

7.99%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

14.77%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

16.12%

+1.10%

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GACA.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCY.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GACA.DE vs. IBCY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GACA.DE nor IBCY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GACA.DE and IBCY.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GACA.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GACA.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBCY.DE.

GACA.DE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity, while IBCY.DE tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multiple-Factor. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GACA.DE and 0.35% for IBCY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GACA.DE and IBCY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer