PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABVX vs. FMCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABVX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABVX achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly lower than FMCSX's 17.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GABVX has underperformed FMCSX with an annualized return of 7.32%, while FMCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.


GABVX

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.48%
YTD
7.38%
6M
10.87%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
7.32%

FMCSX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.05%
YTD
17.82%
6M
18.35%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABVX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABVX
Gabelli Value 25 Fund
7.38%28.77%4.10%8.75%-15.87%14.86%5.86%17.84%-8.19%12.77%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
17.82%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GABVX and FMCSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 1994

0.85

The correlation between GABVX and FMCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABVX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABVX
GABVX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GABVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GABVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABVX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABVXFMCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.74

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.21

14.51

-2.30

GABVX vs. FMCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FMCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABVX and FMCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABVXFMCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.06

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.59

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.69

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.58

-0.07

Drawdowns

GABVX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABVX drawdown since its inception was -63.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FMCSX drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABVX and FMCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABVXFMCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.09%

-62.19%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-8.55%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.17%

-22.33%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-22.33%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-40.55%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

0.00%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-9.35%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.20%

+0.01%

Volatility

GABVX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) is 3.24%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that GABVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABVXFMCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

5.01%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

12.25%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

15.58%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

17.72%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

18.59%

-1.04%

GABVX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABVX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCSX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABVX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison

GABVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than FMCSX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
1.56%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%
GABVX
Gabelli Value 25 Fund
10.26%11.01%0.00%12.15%17.78%12.01%9.32%10.28%9.54%6.82%7.49%17.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABVX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCSX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to GABVX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABVX dropped -63.09% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.

GABVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABVX and FMCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer