PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABVX vs. BTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABVX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABVX achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than BTMFX's 7.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GABVX has underperformed BTMFX with an annualized return of 7.37%, while BTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.


GABVX

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.79%
6M
5.52%
YTD
9.64%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
7.37%
ALL TIME*
9.22%

BTMFX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.15%
6M
4.87%
YTD
7.93%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GABVX vs. BTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABVX
Gabelli Value 25 Fund
9.64%28.77%4.10%8.75%-15.87%14.86%5.86%17.84%-8.19%12.77%
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
7.93%4.29%10.27%13.06%-10.91%24.77%9.72%33.00%-3.36%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GABVX and BTMFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.87

The correlation between GABVX and BTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABVX vs. BTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GABVX
GABVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GABVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GABVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMFX
BTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GABVX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GABVXBTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.24

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.88

3.43

+7.45

GABVX vs. BTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABVX and BTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GABVX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABVX drawdown since its inception was -63.09%, which is greater than BTMFX's maximum drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABVX and BTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABVXBTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.09%

-49.26%

-13.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-7.79%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.17%

-17.77%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.39%

-20.79%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-37.14%

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.68%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-6.12%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.80%

-0.58%

Volatility

GABVX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX) is 3.15%, while Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that GABVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABVXBTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

3.47%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

8.19%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

11.72%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

15.74%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

17.38%

+0.08%

GABVX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABVX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABVX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

GABVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, which matches BTMFX's 10.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
10.06%10.86%4.23%4.41%4.71%4.91%1.98%6.95%5.96%6.61%7.03%6.60%
GABVX
Gabelli Value 25 Fund
10.05%11.01%0.00%12.15%17.78%12.01%9.32%10.28%9.54%6.82%7.49%17.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABVX and BTMFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTMFX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to GABVX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABVX dropped -63.09% vs BTMFX's -49.26%.

GABVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABVX and BTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer