PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABUX vs. ERH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABUX vs. ERH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Utilities Fund (GABUX) and Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABUX achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly higher than ERH's 5.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GABUX has underperformed ERH with an annualized return of 6.02%, while ERH has yielded a comparatively higher 6.37% annualized return.


GABUX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.46%
6M
3.46%
YTD
8.59%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
6.02%
ALL TIME*
6.00%

ERH

1D
0.51%
1M
-1.77%
6M
4.35%
YTD
5.28%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
6.37%
ALL TIME*
7.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$414.94K$329.06K$304.26K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GABUX vs. ERH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABUX
Gabelli Utilities Fund
8.59%16.86%14.38%-6.59%-5.40%17.44%-3.45%18.37%-2.83%8.24%
ERH
Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund
5.28%19.85%25.71%-10.52%-18.38%22.14%-1.15%33.97%-8.98%18.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GABUX and ERH is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2004

0.48

The correlation between GABUX and ERH shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABUX vs. ERH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GABUX
GABUX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GABUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GABUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ERH
ERH Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ERH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERH Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ERH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERH Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GABUX vs. ERH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Utilities Fund (GABUX) and Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GABUXERHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

0.85

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

1.68

+3.24

GABUX vs. ERH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the ERH Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABUX and ERH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GABUX vs. ERH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABUX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, smaller than the maximum ERH drawdown of -69.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABUX and ERH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABUXERHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.88%

-69.81%

+20.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-9.36%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.96%

-19.00%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.98%

-37.85%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.64%

-46.11%

+12.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-5.32%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.10%

-17.20%

+5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

4.70%

-2.05%

Volatility

GABUX vs. ERH - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Utilities Fund (GABUX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) at 3.70%. This indicates that GABUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABUXERHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.70%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

10.60%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.03%

13.03%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

16.73%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

19.71%

-3.42%

GABUX vs. ERH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABUX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ERH's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABUX vs. ERH - Dividend Comparison

GABUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.62%, more than ERH's 8.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERH
Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund
8.57%8.13%7.15%9.19%8.09%5.86%7.20%6.53%8.06%6.82%7.53%8.04%
GABUX
Gabelli Utilities Fund
18.62%18.27%22.50%16.89%13.44%11.03%11.58%9.31%9.50%8.45%9.49%9.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABUX and ERH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABUX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to ERH (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABUX dropped -48.88% vs ERH's -69.81%.

GABUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABUX and ERH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer