GABFX vs. GMUEX
GABFX (GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund) and GMUEX (GMO U.S. Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - GABFX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by GMO, while GMUEX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by GMO. Over the past 10 years, GABFX returned 0.51%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for GMUEX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. GABFX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for GMUEX.
Performance
GABFX vs. GMUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABFX achieves a -3.48% return, which is significantly lower than GMUEX's 13.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GABFX has underperformed GMUEX with an annualized return of 0.51%, while GMUEX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.54% annualized return.
GABFX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- -3.48%
- 6M
- -3.69%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- -1.26%
- 5Y*
- -3.20%
- 10Y*
- 0.51%
GMUEX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 13.68%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 36.11%
- 3Y*
- 23.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
GABFX vs. GMUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | -3.48% | 8.82% | -12.60% | 8.33% | -14.86% | 1.34% | 11.28% | 8.00% | 0.78% | 2.41% |
GMUEX GMO U.S. Equity Fund | 13.68% | 22.24% | 20.97% | 22.02% | -12.66% | 24.28% | 13.56% | 28.62% | -9.77% | 18.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABFX and GMUEX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2009 | -0.02 |
The correlation between GABFX and GMUEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABFX vs. GMUEX — Risk / Return Rank
GABFX
GMUEX
GABFX vs. GMUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) and GMO U.S. Equity Fund (GMUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GABFX | GMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.44 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.92 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 16.23 | -16.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GABFX vs. GMUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABFX drawdown since its inception was -27.84%, smaller than the maximum GMUEX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABFX and GMUEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABFX | GMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.84% | -60.66% | +32.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.58% | -9.19% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.48% | -20.85% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.84% | -28.95% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.84% | -33.90% | +6.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.38% | -2.82% | -14.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -17.23% | +9.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 2.22% | +1.75% |
Volatility
GABFX vs. GMUEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund (GABFX) is 2.57%, while GMO U.S. Equity Fund (GMUEX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that GABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABFX | GMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 5.19% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 11.27% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 14.24% | -4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 19.89% | -5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 19.52% | -9.15% |
GABFX vs. GMUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABFX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GMUEX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
GABFX vs. GMUEX - Dividend Comparison
GABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than GMUEX's 10.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABFX GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund | 2.79% | 2.69% | 4.19% | 5.03% | 0.71% | 1.81% | 1.20% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 7.43% |
GMUEX GMO U.S. Equity Fund | 10.28% | 11.68% | 17.31% | 12.10% | 6.99% | 14.17% | 9.16% | 12.24% | 21.90% | 11.22% | 11.27% | 12.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GABFX and GMUEX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMUEX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to GABFX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABFX dropped -27.84% vs GMUEX's -60.66%.
GMUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GABFX and GMUEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer