PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABF vs. LOPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABF vs. LOPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABF achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than LOPP's 13.15% return.


GABF

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.11%
6M
-1.06%
YTD
-1.93%
1Y
-1.61%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.34%

LOPP

1D
0.51%
1M
-3.85%
6M
5.86%
YTD
13.15%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$95.56K$89.02K$204.10K
$4.28K$5.15K$15.80K

GABF vs. LOPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
-1.93%3.60%44.38%38.92%-0.04%
LOPP
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
13.15%22.61%9.89%4.74%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GABF and LOPP is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between GABF and LOPP has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GABF vs. LOPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GABF
LOPP

Financial Services

85.6%
2.5%

Technology

5.2%
8.5%

Industrials

4.9%
50.1%

Real Estate

4.3%
3.1%

Basic Materials

-

6.2%

Communication Services

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Energy

-

3.8%

Healthcare

-

3.4%

Utilities

-

16.5%

Financial Services

GABF
85.6%
LOPP
2.5%

Technology

GABF
5.2%
LOPP
8.5%

Industrials

GABF
4.9%
LOPP
50.1%

Real Estate

GABF
4.3%
LOPP
3.1%

Basic Materials

GABF

-

LOPP
6.2%

Communication Services

GABF

-

LOPP
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GABF

-

LOPP
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

GABF

-

LOPP
0.5%

Energy

GABF

-

LOPP
3.8%

Healthcare

GABF

-

LOPP
3.4%

Utilities

GABF

-

LOPP
16.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABF vs. LOPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GABF
GABF Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

LOPP
LOPP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GABF vs. LOPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GABFLOPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.21

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

2.15

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

7.11

-7.67

GABF vs. LOPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABF Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the LOPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABF and LOPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GABF vs. LOPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABF drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum LOPP drawdown of -25.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABF and LOPP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABFLOPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-25.28%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.16%

-9.77%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.86%

-20.28%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

-6.12%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-8.09%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.90%

2.95%

+4.95%

Volatility

GABF vs. LOPP - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABFLOPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

4.62%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

14.03%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

17.40%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

18.18%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

17.72%

+2.65%

GABF vs. LOPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than LOPP's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GABF vs. LOPP - Dividend Comparison

GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than LOPP's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
2.00%1.96%4.19%4.95%1.31%0.00%
LOPP
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
0.73%0.83%1.88%2.23%2.01%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABF and LOPP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOPP has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to GABF (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABF dropped -20.86% vs LOPP's -25.28%.

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 18.82% vs 13.97% for LOPP. On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 18.82% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GABF.

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.73% for LOPP.

GABF is categorized as Financials Equities, while LOPP is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GABF and 0.00% for LOPP.

LOPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABF and LOPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer