PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABCX vs. DAMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABCX vs. DAMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli ABC Fund (GABCX) and Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund (DAMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABCX achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than DAMDX's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, GABCX has outperformed DAMDX with an annualized return of 3.38%, while DAMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.02% annualized return.


GABCX

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.35%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.13%
1Y
8.62%
3Y*
5.88%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
3.38%

DAMDX

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.43%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
3.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABCX vs. DAMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABCX
Gabelli ABC Fund
4.14%5.86%2.97%6.84%-2.02%4.37%2.90%4.80%0.20%2.20%
DAMDX
Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund
1.85%7.93%5.29%4.06%0.57%0.12%0.44%5.54%-1.01%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GABCX and DAMDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2000

0.52

The correlation between GABCX and DAMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABCX vs. DAMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABCX
GABCX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GABCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GABCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DAMDX
DAMDX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DAMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DAMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABCX vs. DAMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli ABC Fund (GABCX) and Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund (DAMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABCXDAMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.94

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

6.12

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

35.90

-25.66

GABCX vs. DAMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the DAMDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABCX and DAMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABCXDAMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.50

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.74

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.76

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

-0.14

+1.03

Drawdowns

GABCX vs. DAMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABCX drawdown since its inception was -10.80%, smaller than the maximum DAMDX drawdown of -69.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABCX and DAMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABCXDAMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.80%

-69.68%

+58.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-1.03%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.67%

-1.89%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.67%

-8.44%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.80%

-8.44%

-2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-35.09%

+34.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-48.76%

+47.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.17%

+0.69%

Volatility

GABCX vs. DAMDX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli ABC Fund (GABCX) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund (DAMDX) at 1.00%. This indicates that GABCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABCXDAMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.00%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.61%

1.34%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.83%

1.80%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.76%

4.34%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

4.00%

+0.29%

GABCX vs. DAMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DAMDX's 2.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABCX vs. DAMDX - Dividend Comparison

GABCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than DAMDX's 7.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAMDX
Dunham Monthly Distribution Fund
7.61%7.83%8.84%8.77%5.35%3.47%3.64%6.31%4.86%4.27%3.54%4.39%
GABCX
Gabelli ABC Fund
4.43%4.61%0.00%3.35%1.38%4.55%0.44%2.95%3.69%0.13%2.37%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABCX and DAMDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABCX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to DAMDX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABCX dropped -10.80% vs DAMDX's -69.68%.

DAMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABCX and DAMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer