PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABBX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABBX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABBX achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 14.20% return.


GABBX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
6.63%
6M
8.84%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
8.85%

FLCOX

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.10%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.80%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABBX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund
6.63%17.41%10.13%7.61%-9.62%20.18%5.09%26.43%-10.90%10.92%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
14.20%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GABBX and FLCOX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.95

The correlation between GABBX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABBX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABBX
GABBX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GABBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GABBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABBX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABBXFLCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

4.17

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

17.54

-7.23

GABBX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABBX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABBXFLCOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.63

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.70

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.60

-0.27

Drawdowns

GABBX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABBX drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, which is greater than FLCOX's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABBX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABBXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.85%

-38.28%

-22.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-6.80%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-15.60%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

-19.00%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.04%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-4.45%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.62%

+0.51%

Volatility

GABBX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) is 2.60%, while Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that GABBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABBXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.97%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

8.10%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

10.80%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

14.83%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

17.63%

-0.29%

GABBX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABBX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABBX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

GABBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.83%, more than FLCOX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.32%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%
GABBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund
11.83%12.62%12.57%1.43%1.71%11.25%2.90%4.42%11.77%16.73%5.97%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GABBX and FLCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCOX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to GABBX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABBX dropped -60.85% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABBX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer