GABBX vs. FALGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GABBX (Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund) and FALGX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GABBX returned 8.95%/yr vs 12.63%/yr for FALGX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GABBX charges 2.00%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FALGX.

Performance

GABBX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, GABBX has underperformed FALGX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while FALGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.63% annualized return.

GABBX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: 6.16%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: 8.95%
• ALL TIME*: 6.67%

FALGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 4.78%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: 12.63%
• ALL TIME*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GABBX Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GABBX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GABBX Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund	10.19%	17.41%	10.13%	7.61%	-9.62%	20.18%	5.09%	26.43%	-10.90%	12.10%
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M	0.00%	19.09%	18.68%	22.88%	-8.40%	25.20%	8.27%	31.01%	-8.88%	16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GABBX and FALGX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 1999	0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between GABBX and FALGX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GABBX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GABBX

GABBX Risk / Return Rank: 70
GABBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
GABBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GABBX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GABBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
GABBX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FALGX

FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GABBX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GABBX	FALGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	0.37	+1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	0.54	+1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.11	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	0.52	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.33	0.78	+8.55

GABBX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABBX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GABBX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABBX drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABBX and FALGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GABBX	FALGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.85%	-64.07%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-5.06%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.01%	-21.78%	+6.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.42%	-21.78%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.64%	-37.58%	-1.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-4.20%	+4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.08%	-14.39%	+3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	3.14%	-1.15%

Volatility

GABBX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that GABBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GABBX	FALGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	0.00%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	0.00%	+8.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	7.26%	+4.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	16.49%	-1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	18.53%	-1.28%

GABBX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABBX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

GABBX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

GABBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than FALGX's 5.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M	5.76%	5.76%	0.00%	3.20%	1.91%	6.44%	5.25%	8.39%	16.99%	6.42%	1.85%	2.74%
GABBX Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund	11.45%	12.62%	12.57%	1.43%	1.71%	11.25%	2.90%	4.42%	11.77%	16.73%	5.97%	3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GABBX and FALGX in my portfolio?

GABBX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GABBX or FALGX?

GABBX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABBX dropped -60.85% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GABBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.