PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABBX vs. FALGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABBX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, GABBX has underperformed FALGX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while FALGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.


GABBX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
6.85%
6M
10.15%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
8.87%

FALGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.45%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABBX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund
6.85%17.41%10.13%7.61%-9.62%20.18%5.09%26.43%-10.90%12.10%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
0.00%19.09%18.68%22.88%-8.40%25.20%8.27%31.01%-8.88%16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GABBX and FALGX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 1999

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between GABBX and FALGX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABBX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABBX
GABBX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GABBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GABBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FALGX
FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABBX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABBXFALGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

1.87

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

2.62

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.50

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

5.95

-2.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.81

10.80

+0.01

GABBX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABBX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABBXFALGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.87

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.65

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.71

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.44

-0.11

Drawdowns

GABBX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABBX drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABBX and FALGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABBXFALGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.85%

-64.07%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-5.06%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-21.78%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

-21.78%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

-37.58%

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-4.20%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-14.43%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.79%

-0.66%

Volatility

GABBX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that GABBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABBXFALGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

0.00%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

4.23%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

8.08%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

16.65%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

18.67%

-1.33%

GABBX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABBX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABBX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

GABBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than FALGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
5.76%5.76%0.00%3.20%1.91%6.44%5.25%8.39%16.99%6.42%1.85%2.74%
GABBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund
11.81%12.62%12.57%1.43%1.71%11.25%2.90%4.42%11.77%16.73%5.97%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABBX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABBX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABBX dropped -60.85% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

GABBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABBX and FALGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer