GABBX vs. DRCVX
GABBX (Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund) and DRCVX (Comstock Capital Value Fund) are both mutual funds - GABBX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Gabelli, while DRCVX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Gabelli. Over the past 10 years, GABBX returned 9.34%/yr vs -4.56%/yr for DRCVX. At a correlation of -0.67, they often move in opposite directions. GABBX charges 2.00%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for DRCVX.
Performance
GABBX vs. DRCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABBX achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly higher than DRCVX's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GABBX has outperformed DRCVX with an annualized return of 9.34%, while DRCVX has yielded a comparatively lower -4.56% annualized return.
GABBX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
DRCVX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- -4.56%
GABBX vs. DRCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABBX Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund | 6.68% | 17.41% | 10.13% | 7.61% | -9.62% | 20.18% | 5.09% | 26.43% | -10.90% | 12.10% |
DRCVX Comstock Capital Value Fund | 3.17% | 11.55% | 2.02% | 6.55% | 4.13% | -2.16% | -5.36% | -25.76% | 7.76% | -20.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABBX and DRCVX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 1999 | -0.67 |
The correlation between GABBX and DRCVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.67 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABBX vs. DRCVX — Risk / Return Rank
GABBX
DRCVX
GABBX vs. DRCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GABBX | DRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.75 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 10.30 | -7.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 36.95 | -27.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GABBX vs. DRCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABBX drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, smaller than the maximum DRCVX drawdown of -97.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABBX and DRCVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABBX | DRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.85% | -97.47% | +36.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -0.89% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.01% | -3.82% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.42% | -4.08% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.64% | -54.27% | +15.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -96.61% | +94.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -65.92% | +54.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 0.25% | +1.89% |
Volatility
GABBX vs. DRCVX - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) at 0.93%. This indicates that GABBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABBX | DRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 0.93% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 1.91% | +6.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 2.93% | +8.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 4.58% | +9.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 9.75% | +7.60% |
GABBX vs. DRCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABBX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DRCVX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GABBX vs. DRCVX - Dividend Comparison
GABBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.83%, more than DRCVX's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRCVX Comstock Capital Value Fund | 1.90% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GABBX Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund | 11.83% | 12.62% | 12.57% | 1.43% | 1.71% | 11.25% | 2.90% | 4.42% | 11.77% | 16.73% | 5.97% | 3.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GABBX and DRCVX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABBX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to DRCVX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABBX dropped -60.85% vs DRCVX's -97.47%.
DRCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GABBX and DRCVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer