GAAVX vs. GQEFX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX).

GAAVX is managed by GMO. It was launched on May 1, 2019. GQEFX is an actively managed fund by GMO. It was launched on Feb 6, 2004.

Performance

GAAVX vs. GQEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GAAVX vs. GQEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund	3.33%	15.19%	-5.70%	6.07%	3.63%	-5.12%	-0.28%	3.49%
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV	-7.00%	19.64%	17.54%	28.95%	-15.30%	31.76%	18.39%	16.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAAVX achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly higher than GQEFX's -7.00% return.

GAAVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 3.33%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 13.78%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 3.63%
• 10Y*: —

GQEFX

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -6.44%
• YTD: -7.00%
• 6M: -2.28%
• 1Y: 12.46%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAAVX vs. GQEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAAVX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GQEFX's 0.47% expense ratio.

GAAVX

GMO Alternative Allocation Fund

GQEFX

GMO Quality Fund Class IV

Return for Risk

GAAVX vs. GQEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAAVX

GAAVX Risk / Return Rank: 90
GAAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GAAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GAAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GAAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GAAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

GQEFX

GQEFX Risk / Return Rank: 26
GQEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GQEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GQEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GQEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
GQEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAAVX vs. GQEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAAVX	GQEFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	0.75	+1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	1.20	+1.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.16	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	1.01	+2.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	4.06	+4.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GAAVX vs. GQEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAAVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the GQEFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAAVX and GQEFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAAVX	GQEFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	0.75	+1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.74	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.81	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between GAAVX and GQEFX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GAAVX vs. GQEFX - Dividend Comparison

GAAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, less than GQEFX's 11.99% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund	8.49%	8.78%	0.00%	5.18%	0.91%	4.10%	2.41%	2.61%	0.00%	0.00%
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV	11.99%	11.15%	3.70%	3.43%	11.84%	10.23%	13.62%	8.09%	21.69%	7.08%

Drawdowns

GAAVX vs. GQEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAAVX drawdown since its inception was -9.59%, smaller than the maximum GQEFX drawdown of -30.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAVX and GQEFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAAVX	GQEFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.59%	-30.42%	+20.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-12.74%	+9.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.59%	-24.22%	+14.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-10.30%	+9.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.11%	-4.20%	+1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	3.17%	-1.63%

Volatility

GAAVX vs. GQEFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) is 1.85%, while GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that GAAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAAVX	GQEFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.85%	5.62%	-3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.81%	9.67%	-4.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.82%	16.60%	-9.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.81%	15.86%	-10.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.87%	17.84%	-11.97%